Teams

HFTC - Good Vibrations

*2023 Houston Fall League (2022) NA - Tuesday Ladies Doubles · 4.0 Ladies

16 players · average NTRP 3.60 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-11-29vs MPTC - Top SpinnersLost 01
L#1 DoublesSimran Khadka / Jeannette Miller vs Karen Jensen / Jillian Ermis3-6, 6-7
2022-11-22vs MPTC - Alley CatsLost 01
L#2 DoublesSimran Khadka / LaRita Cormier vs XUN ZHAI / Cari Curtis4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesSimran Khadka / Jill Martin vs ZandraZophia Jones / Kim Fuke6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-10-25vs The Met - CosMetpolitansLost 01
L#1 DoublesSimran Khadka / Anastacia Bynoe vs Susan Paling / Claire Hackney6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2022-10-11vs ROCC - Night ROCCersLost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Martin / Simran Khadka vs Katie Wood-Sponsel / Nan Franklin6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Magdalena Pyrkosz
published
3.87
Simran Khadka
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.57
Eleanor Putnam-Farr
published 3.5
3.54
3.39
Honeca Ngov-Fuxa
published 3.5
3.36
Diana Gano
published
3.35
Linda Jacobs
published
3.25
Colette Burns
published 3.5
Anastacia Bynoe
published 3.5
3.16
Mackenzie Warner
published
3.14
Leslie Gonsalves
published
2.99
LaRita Cormier
published
Jeannette Miller
published
Jill Martin
published
Phyllis Kirkland
published
Samantha Carreon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Phyllis Kirkland + Leslie Gonsalves8549% games−4.3% vs expected
Linda Jacobs + Eleanor Putnam-Farr123 matchesnot enough data
Simran Khadka + Anastacia Bynoe123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Magdalena Pyrkosz
43W–39L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.91
4
Simran Khadka
62W–91L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.87
3.5
Eleanor Putnam-Farr
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.57
Maria Glopil Pasamonte
9W–32L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Honeca Ngov-Fuxa
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
Diana Gano
5W–21L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
3.36
Linda Jacobs
47W–78L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
3.35
3.5
Colette Burns
15W–19L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Anastacia Bynoe
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mackenzie Warner
20W–20L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
Leslie Gonsalves
59W–89L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
LaRita Cormier
24W–40L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
Jeannette Miller
15W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jill Martin
14W–23L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Phyllis Kirkland
26W–32L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Samantha Carreon
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.