Teams

Chapman 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PM

2026 Piedmont Singles 18+ · 4.5 Men Monday

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-10vs Houston 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesBrian Cohen vs Tommy Houston2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMarko Milojevic vs Aaron Charles Pascua2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesLee Picklesimer vs Aadarsh Sivaprakash6-2, 0-6
2026-08-04vs Houston 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PMWon 10
W#1 SinglesMatt Hughes vs Ako Barnes6-3, 6-2
2026-07-27vs Schiess 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PMSplit 11
W#2 SinglesPolo Carrera vs Taylor Schiess6-4, 6-3
L#3 SinglesEdwin Maffiold vs Charlie Keeley5-7, 3-6
2026-07-14vs Schiess 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PMWon 21
L#1 SinglesEdwin Maffiold vs Taylor Schiess7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBrian Cohen vs TK Vacharee4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 SinglesLee Picklesimer vs James Kash6-4, 6-0
2026-06-30vs Houston 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesPolo Carrera vs Tommy Houston3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBrian Cohen vs Caleb Dawson3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesMatt Hughes vs Wilson Paine5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-15vs Schiess 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PMWon 20
W#1 SinglesLee Picklesimer vs Josue Sanchez6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesEdwin Maffiold vs John Kim6-1, 6-2
2026-06-08vs Houston 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesPolo Carrera vs Caleb Dawson1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesLee Picklesimer vs Wilson Paine6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 SinglesEdwin Maffiold vs Aaron Charles Pascua3-6, 3-6
2026-05-18vs Schiess 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PMWon 20
W#1 SinglesBrian Cohen vs Charlie Keeley6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMatt Hughes vs James Kash6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Matt Hughes
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.37
Brian Cohen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.19
Lee Picklesimer
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
4.12
Edwin Maffiold
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.12
Polo Carrera
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.91
Marko Milojevic
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matt Hughes
34W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
4.49
4.5
Brian Cohen
12W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
4.37
Lee Picklesimer
20W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Edwin Maffiold
5W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
4.12
Polo Carrera
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.12
Marko Milojevic
19W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.