Teams

2 ACAC Morgan

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-12vs 4 MAC ScottWon 10
W#1 SinglesKatie Vasconcelos vs Crystal Gibson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-11-06vs 6 CCV DeLaceyLost 01
L#2 SinglesKate Zachry vs Megan Hodges6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2025-11-05vs 5 KRA TurnerWon 21
L#1 SinglesSilvia Sykes vs Melissa Rhoades0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesKatie Vasconcelos vs Katy Holder6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesKate Zachry vs Melanie Spears2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-22vs 1 Willow Oaks CurdtsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKate Zachry vs Gena Burr2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKatie Vasconcelos vs Kelly Stalls6-4, 6-1
2025-10-15vs 5 KRA TurnerLost 02
L#1 SinglesSilvia Sykes vs Melissa Rhoades4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesDina Weddle vs Katie Intihar4-6, 4-6
2025-10-11vs 6 CCV DeLaceyLost 02
L#1 SinglesKatie Vasconcelos vs Anne Henry3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSilvia Sykes vs Catherine Benevento3-6, 0-6
2025-09-24vs 3 Raintree VerderyLost 01
L#1 SinglesDina Weddle vs Meredith Nusbaum3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Kristen Walton
published
3.91
Kate Zachry
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.79
Katie Vasconcelos
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.77
Rebecca Morgan
published
3.76
Silvia Sykes
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.61
Andrea Morrow
published 4
3.58
Dina Weddle
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
Julie Ruth
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Morgan + Kristen Walton7356% games+3.5% vs expected
Kate Zachry + Dina Weddle3260% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Walton
33W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Kate Zachry
104W–90L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.91
Katie Vasconcelos
43W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Rebecca Morgan
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Silvia Sykes
102W–72L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Andrea Morrow
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Dina Weddle
148W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Julie Ruth
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.