Teams

Bolles/18/3.5-2.5/Tri/Red’s

2025 LAF Tri Level 18 & Over - Men · 3.5,3.0,2.5 Laf (18&O) Men

9 players · average NTRP 2.67 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-04vs McDermott/18/3.5-2.5/TRI/OCCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesChandler Credeur / Ryan Bordelon vs Bill McDermott / Joseph Duplechain6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGrant Smith / Dustin Deville vs Murray Dickens / Joshua Guidry4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-07-31vs McDermott/18/3.5-2.5/TRI/OCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesThomas Quinn / Jarrod Richoux vs Joey Guidry / Dwayne Searle4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChandler Credeur / Ryan Bordelon vs Bill McDermott / Joshua Guidry6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGrant Smith / Charles Piccione vs Murray Dickens / Doug Payne6-4, 7-5
2025-07-21vs McDermott/18/3.5-2.5/TRI/OCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesThomas Quinn / Jarrod Richoux vs Jason Guidry / Donald Bernard6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesChandler Credeur / Ryan Bordelon vs Bill McDermott / JJ Wiggins4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGrant Smith / Brandon Hoffmann vs Murray Dickens / Joshua Guidry6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5,3.0,2.5 Laf (18&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Jarrod Richoux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Josh Wheeler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Chandler Credeur
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Ryan Bordelon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Jeffrey Peatross
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Lary Bolles
published
2.35
Dustin Deville
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.14
Brandon Hoffmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.01
Charles Piccione
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lary Bolles + Brandon Hoffmann134 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Bordelon + Jeffrey Peatross134 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Bordelon + Chandler Credeur213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jarrod Richoux
42W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Josh Wheeler
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.08
3
Chandler Credeur
26W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Ryan Bordelon
18W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Jeffrey Peatross
20W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Lary Bolles
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Dustin Deville
9W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.35
2.5
Brandon Hoffmann
9W–18L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.14
2.5
Charles Piccione
5W–12L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.