Teams

Zurn/Larsen- Northern Heights 18+ W23

2023 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-02-20vs Hurd/Harris 18+ W23Won 10
W#2 DoublesLina Wang / Emily Arndt vs Ellen Butler / Amy Haugen6-2, 6-4
2023-02-13vs Hobbs/Nauman 18+ W23Won 10
W#3 DoublesEmily Arndt / Katelyn Zurn vs Teri Heltne / Dunja Sher6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElise Bonin / Emily Arndt vs Ruth Eliason / Ellen Dobbins2-6, 1-6
2023-01-30vs ALLEX 3.5 18+ W23Won 10
W#3 DoublesEmily Arndt / Katelyn Zurn vs Caroline Landree / Samantha Swanhorst5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-01-16vs Hurd/Harris 18+ W23Won 10
W#3 DoublesEmily Arndt / Katelyn Zurn vs Jacie Hurd / Anna Rindt6-0, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Amy Stern
published 4
3.77
Whitney Nyholm
published 4
3.68
Perris Deppa
published
3.60
Katie Day
published
3.60
Lina Wang
published
3.44
Emily Arndt
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.32
Alexandra Hilst
published 3.5
3.26
Irina Hogetvedt
published
Sarah van Camp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Stern + Katie Day6353% games−0.4% vs expected
Lina Wang + Emily Arndt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Stern
22W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.85
4
Whitney Nyholm
41W–25L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Perris Deppa
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Katie Day
12W–12L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.60
Lina Wang
18W–17L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.60
Emily Arndt
112W–89L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%65%34%
3.44
3.5
Alexandra Hilst
49W–50L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.32
Irina Hogetvedt
6W–16L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Sarah van Camp
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.