Teams

Blackburn/Farmington/FAC

2026 Adult 55 & Over Spring 1 League · 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-25vs Casey/Bella Vista/KTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Akins / Cathy Faber vs Karen Casey / Barbara Johnson6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTiffiny Humbert / Gayla Saegert vs Anne Hurley / Mary Grace Stich7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDebby Blackburn / Gabriela Cordero vs Kitti Severns / Nancy Ellman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-11vs Hickman/Fayetteville/SRCWon 21
L#1 DoublesGayla Saegert / Gabriela Cordero vs Beth Gieringer Mcwha / Kristy Maher6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCynthia Scharlau / Julie Ready vs Karen HIckman / Rebecca Williams6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Akins / Cathy Faber vs Amber Gaskill / Jennifer Hierholzer6-1, 6-2
2026-03-30vs Schaller/Rogers/PCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesTiffiny Humbert / Gabriela Cordero vs Suzanne Lankford / Lara Henry6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Ho / Kimberly Kilgore vs Libby Schaller / Sharon Gunter2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Akins / Cathy Faber vs Paige Ferguson / Andrea Boyle6-4, 6-3
2026-03-17vs Russell/Rogers/MRCLost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Ho / Jacqueline Shearman vs Leah Hoffmann / Donna Russell6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDebby Blackburn / Gayla Saegert vs Missy Allard / Maria Blunden3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCynthia Scharlau / Julie Ready vs Heidi May / Cecilia Raymond2-6, 3-6
2026-03-07vs Hickman/Fayetteville/SRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Shearman / Kimberly Kilgore vs Rebecca Williams / Kristy Maher7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDebby Blackburn / Gayla Saegert vs Amber Gaskill / Deann Richmond6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCathy Faber / Gabriela Cordero vs Karen HIckman / Odulia Sites6-1, 6-2
2026-03-01vs Casey/Bella Vista/KTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesCynthia Scharlau / Julie Ready vs Barbara Johnson / Julie DeFalco6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Shearman / Nancy Ho vs Catherine Young / Karen Casey6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Akins / Cathy Faber vs Marsha Taylor / Mary Grace Stich6-4, 6-0
2026-02-22vs Schaller/Rogers/PCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebby Blackburn / Julie Ready vs Leann Akers / Paige Ferguson6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Akins / Cathy Faber vs Suzanne Lankford / Sharon Gunter7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Shearman / Nancy Ho vs Lina Cheung / Amy Elliott6-0, 6-0
2026-02-07vs Russell/Rogers/MRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Ho / Kimberly Kilgore vs Heidi May / Missy Allard6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCynthia Scharlau / Julie Ready vs Maria Blunden / Leah Hoffmann6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTiffiny Humbert / Gayla Saegert vs Donna Russell / Cecilia Raymond3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Jacqueline Shearman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.88
Cynthia Scharlau
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Susan Akins
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.79
Kimberly Kilgore
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Julie Ready
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.74
Debby Blackburn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Cathy Faber
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.64
Gayla Saegert
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.61
Tiffiny Humbert
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Gabriela Cordero
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gayla Saegert + Tiffiny Humbert8161% games+6.4% vs expected
Susan Akins + Cathy Faber5264% games+3.6% vs expected
Julie Ready + Cynthia Scharlau9364% games−1.0% vs expected
Cathy Faber + Gayla Saegert4166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacqueline Shearman
23W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.98
4
Cynthia Scharlau
15W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.88
Susan Akins
25W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Kimberly Kilgore
12W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Julie Ready
17W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Debby Blackburn
12W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Cathy Faber
19W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Gayla Saegert
35W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.64
Tiffiny Humbert
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
Gabriela Cordero
6W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.