Teams

DCURRIE40

2022 Cap Spring USTA 40 & over · 3.0 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-18vs DReaLost 01
L#2 DoublesChad Cox / John Cruz vs Brian McLean / Ed Stempien3-6, 2-6
2022-05-10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDouglas Currie / Chad Cox vs Kevin Hampton / Michael Gee2-6, 1-6
2022-05-04vs JAllessio-Hasentree 40+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesChad Cox / Douglas Currie vs John Allessio / Aaron Earwood1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEdward Murgitroyd / Mark Zorko vs David Richey / Scott Leaver3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-04-22Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMark Zorko / William Bullock vs Aaron Woy / John Alemanni6-7, 3-6
2022-04-06vs RGarrettLost 01
L#1 DoublesChad Cox / Jeff Duncan vs Ryan Garrett / Ronald Elliott2-6, 1-6
2022-03-30vs JAllessio-Hasentree 40+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChad Cox / Mark Zorko vs Gregory Allex / Brian Williford1-6, 0-6
2022-03-28vs JUnderhillLost 02
L#2 DoublesChad Cox / Peter Flack vs Tom Pullara / Aaron Woy2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Gonwa / Mark Zorko vs Thomas Belch / Tracy Houston6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.70
Mark Rosenberger
published
2.63
Peter Flack
published
2.62
Mark Zorko
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.50
Chad Cox
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Rosenberger
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Peter Flack
11W–27L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63
3
Mark Zorko
36W–64L career · 4 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
2.62
3
Chad Cox
31W–73L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.