Teams

La.Kane18T

2024 Capital Tri-Level 18 & Over · 2.5-3.0-3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-18vs To.Sutler18TLost 02
L#1 DoublesKatie Morrow / Mary Tulenko vs April Bazin / Christine Hughes2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEva Frecker / Julia Butler vs Julie Clark / Rachel McLean3-6, 1-6
2024-07-11vs Sh.Littleton18TSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKatie Morrow / Mary Tulenko vs Shannon Littleton / Sarah Soleim6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEva Frecker / Jessica McGinnis vs Holly Atkinson / Patty Parrnelli3-6, 5-7
2024-06-20vs Ki.Lamm18TWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatie Morrow / Mary Tulenko vs Andrea Desonglo / Alicia Fitzsimmons6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSabrina Kane / Eva Frecker vs Kristin Blankenhorn Tharpe / Darcy Louzao6-1, 6-1
2024-06-13vs La.Ross18TWon 10
W#2 DoublesSabrina Kane / Julia Butler vs Lisa Bakowski / Julie Liddle6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-04vs Ka.Kiel18TLost 02
L#1 DoublesKatie Morrow / Mary Tulenko vs Mariana Lima Gonzalez / Caroline Wright3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Williams / Sabrina Kane vs Rachel Bricker / Meghan OFerral2-6, 5-7
2024-05-30vs Je.Straughn18TLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulia Butler / Eva Frecker vs Elizabeth Lindsay / Elizabeth Marriott0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5-3.0-3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Taylor Anthony
published
3.46
Katie Morrow
published
3.18
Emily Rubin
published
2.88
Mary Tulenko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Shannon Sikes
published
2.84
Sabrina Kane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Eva Frecker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Jessica McGinnis
published
2.38
Lauren Kane
published
2.30
Lusally Hong
published
Julia Butler
published
Maria Riemann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica McGinnis + Eva Frecker213 matchesnot enough data
Sabrina Kane + Eva Frecker303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Taylor Anthony
20W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.55
Katie Morrow
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
Emily Rubin
19W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%10%90%
3.18
3
Mary Tulenko
83W–113L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
2.88
Shannon Sikes
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
Sabrina Kane
248W–175L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Eva Frecker
27W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
2.77
Jessica McGinnis
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Lauren Kane
19W–19L career · no lines in 2024
0%80%20%
2.38
Lusally Hong
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%92%8%
2.30
Julia Butler
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Riemann
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.