Teams

SGV Dare Doubles-Vo-La Habra/SA2

2025 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 4.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#2 DoublesEVAN CHANG / Kyle McCain vs Ryan Cox / Michael Pang7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKy Vo / EVAN CHANG vs Eric Lu / Cesar Garcia1-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesWilson Teo / Judd Tongprajiad vs Maki Potes / Arman Davtyan2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKy Vo / Derek Fu vs Ron Chow / Wesley Wang4-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesMichael Tschebaum / EVAN CHANG vs Leonardo Kim / Alan Han7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKy Vo / Michael Tschebaum vs Edgar Bove / Ulises Lorenzo Garcia4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Cheng / Judd Tongprajiad vs Ryan Cox / Brent Young4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEVAN CHANG / Judah Momon vs Luciano Rodriguez / Chad Rodriguez1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKy Vo / EVAN CHANG vs Ulises Lorenzo Garcia / Jeffrey Huang6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ
published
4.19
Nicolas Stansbury
published
4.09
Judah Momon
published
3.94
EVAN CHANG
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.93
Hien Le
published
3.91
Michael Tschebaum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Ky Vo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Derek Fu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Judd Tongprajiad
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Willie Yeh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Peter Cheng
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jermaine Montgomery
published
Kyle McCain
published
Wilson Teo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
ZaiJun Lu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ
18W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.30
Nicolas Stansbury
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
4.19
Judah Momon
9W–17L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
EVAN CHANG
97W–139L career · 5 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.94
Hien Le
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.93
Michael Tschebaum
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.91
Ky Vo
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.88
4
Derek Fu
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Judd Tongprajiad
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.60
Willie Yeh
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.42
Peter Cheng
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.26
Jermaine Montgomery
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kyle McCain
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Wilson Teo
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
ZaiJun Lu
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.