Teams

YTC-Stephen

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-10-10vs IND-FitzgeraldLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Stephen / Marcie Ehlis vs Peter Ho / Alyssa Fitzgerald6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTimothy Miller / Stacy Stephen vs Bryce Borland / Tiffany Sauer6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJonathan Whiteside / Stephanie Flowers vs Max Larsen / Kellee Bates4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-10-09vs CBRC-Team JoLost 12
L#1 DoublesStacy Stephen / Timothy Miller vs Jack Wang / Jody Davey2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDawn Degrasse / Jonathan Whiteside vs Edward Kim / Michelle Glenn6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Flowers / Danny Anslinger vs Scott Dowson / Xia Suter3-6, 0-6
2021-10-09vs PC-Get Em Done In TwoLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Flowers / Jonathan Whiteside vs Eldon Monson / Annette Rose7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGena Franklin / Scott Stephen vs Ryan Lieberman / Karen Madsen6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMarcie Ehlis / Timothy Miller vs Carrie Perry / Jim Perry6-7, 4-6
2021-10-08vs CBRC-SamuelWon 30
W#1 DoublesDawn Degrasse / Jonathan Whiteside vs Janel Bhattacharya / Evan Mehlenbacher6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStacy Stephen / Timothy Miller vs Diana Titechko / Adam Hrebeniuk6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesGena Franklin / Danny Anslinger vs Amy Nguyen / Todd Samuel7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Gena Franklin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.78
Stephanie Flowers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.57
Marcie Ehlis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.55
Dawn Degrasse
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.52
Stacy Stephen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Danny Anslinger
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.17
Scott Stephen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jonathan Whiteside
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Whiteside + Dawn Degrasse4258% games+3.2% vs expected
Jonathan Whiteside + Stephanie Flowers0538% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Degrasse + Stacy Stephen213 matchesnot enough data
Danny Anslinger + Stacy Stephen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gena Franklin
51W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Stephanie Flowers
29W–60L career · 3 lines in 2022
96%4%<1%
3.78
4
Marcie Ehlis
40W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Dawn Degrasse
88W–115L career · 5 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Stacy Stephen
70W–78L career · 5 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Danny Anslinger
46W–43L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Scott Stephen
59W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Jonathan Whiteside
25W–27L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.