Teams

Ng

2021 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Debbie Spitzer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Jing Feng
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Mihee Park
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2021-08-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesMihee Park / Wanda Ng vs Madeleine Bourland / Jennifer Stevenson6-1, 6-4
2021-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesJing Feng / Debbie Spitzer vs Elizabeth Maguire / Ruth Semon6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2021-07-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDebbie Spitzer / Wanda Ng vs Rochelle Pluymers / Rebecca Griffith5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-07-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesJing Feng / Mihee Park vs Barbara Gram / Rachael Seeger6-1, 6-2
2021-07-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesJing Feng / Wanda Ng vs Robin Welter / Chris van Leeuwen6-1, 6-2
2021-07-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesWanda Ng / Mihee Park vs Ann-Marie Lundberg / Yanchen Qi7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2021-07-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesMihee Park / Wanda Ng vs Katie Jurgenson / Sara Crate7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2021-07-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesJing Feng / Wanda Ng vs Sarah Larson / Karen Kraus6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Debbie Spitzer
145W–63L career
0%74%26%
3.53
3.5
Jing Feng
113W–80L career
1%99%0%
3.25
3
Mihee Park
147W–89L career
0%23%77%
3.20

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.