Teams

Yates - Dbls 3.5W

2022 Piedmont Summer Daze Doubles · Summer Daze 3.5 Women Night

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Summer Daze 3.5 Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
3.31
Margaret Joseph
published
3.26
Trisha Kirby
published
3.24
Allison Walsh
published 3.5
3.21
Stephanie Gilmer
published
3.20
Lucy Callahan
published
3.20
Kelly Guyler
published
3.11
Dana Cossick
published 3.5
3.04
Jennifer Yates
published
2.75
Laura Ambler
published
Jennifer Tewksbury
published
Melody Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Yates + Allison Walsh1441% gamesnot enough data
Christina Schulenklopper + Lucy Callahan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christina Schulenklopper
18W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Margaret Joseph
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Trisha Kirby
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Allison Walsh
20W–27L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Stephanie Gilmer
11W–25L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Lucy Callahan
12W–22L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Kelly Guyler
31W–20L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Dana Cossick
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
Jennifer Yates
8W–28L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
Laura Ambler
18W–12L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Jennifer Tewksbury
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melody Davis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.