Teams

Jo.Cockerham18C

2024 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-29vs Ad.Whitesell18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrent Berry / Timothy Koves vs Camilo Pena / Gary McAuliffe4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAndrew Dudeck / Daniel Wascher vs Adam Whitesell / Robert Brown0-6, 0-6
2024-09-15vs De.Farmer18C6.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTimothy Koves / Daniel Wascher vs Adam Bryan / Gary George1-6, 1-6
2024-09-08vs Ga.Fye18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Dudeck / Daniel Wascher vs Marcelo Roschel / Harrison Edwards1-6, 0-6
2024-09-05vs Mi.Ratliff18C6.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesTimothy Koves / Brent Berry vs Montgomery Fletcher / Todd Sprouse6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNathan Daigle / Daniel Wascher vs Michael Ratliff / David McNulty3-6, 1-6
2024-08-31vs Er.Moritz18CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrew Dudeck / Daniel Wascher vs Chun Lav / John Hoomani1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTimothy Koves / Warren McNeill vs Darian Spell / Greg Myers6-3, 3-0
2024-08-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesDaniel Wascher / Nathan Daigle vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-25Won 10
W#3 DoublesAndrew Dudeck / Daniel Wascher vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Timothy Koves
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.25
Philip Robertson
published
3.22
Andrew Dudeck
published 3.5
3.13
Rick Smith
published
3.12
Nathan Daigle
published 3.5
3.03
Joseph Cockerham
published
2.77
Bryan Sutton
published 3
2.60
Brent Berry
published 3
2.46
Daniel Wascher
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philip Robertson + Timothy Koves4156% games−0.1% vs expected
Rick Smith + Timothy Koves213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Timothy Koves
234W–124L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.52
Philip Robertson
23W–19L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Andrew Dudeck
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.22
Rick Smith
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Nathan Daigle
10W–26L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
Joseph Cockerham
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Bryan Sutton
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Brent Berry
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Daniel Wascher
19W–52L career · 7 lines in 2024
0%61%39%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.