Teams

Payne Park Wilson

2024 Sarasota Combo 50 & Over Fall Weekday · 8.5 W Thursday

11 players · average NTRP 4.07 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-12-05vs Cedars Island GirlsWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichele Rose / SueAnn Sanders vs Pat Brugger / Elizabeth Scheible6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSally Alford / Susan Marro vs Cindy Fancher / Dorene Seider6-1, 6-3
2024-11-14vs Sarasota/Deuitch/50&Over8.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bright / Carrie Carretta vs Ann Pfister-Brown / Marjorie Petruccelli2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSally Alford / Kara Beene vs Tracy Mediratta / Ana Areosa0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Wilson / SueAnn Sanders vs Maureen Thomas / Lynn Deuitch7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2024-11-07vs LWR NicholsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Wilson / Susan Marro vs Christie Boylston / Gina Hagopian6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSueAnn Sanders / Marilyn Weisenberg vs Sandy Severs / Kim Eck4-6, 4-6
2024-10-31vs Cedars Island GirlsLost 03
L#1 DoublesTami Dalto / Susan Marro vs Jackie Dedrick / Colleen Salvatore2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarilyn Weisenberg / Carrie Carretta vs Yuka Pearl / Mari-Ann Kucharek2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Rosenberg / Lisa Klemeyer vs Lisa Tyson / Pat Brugger2-6, 2-6
2024-10-30vs Cedars Island GirlsLost 12
L#1 DoublesCindy Rosenberg / Lisa Klemeyer vs Mari-Ann Kucharek / Vickie Miller2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Rose / SueAnn Sanders vs Colleen Salvatore / Jackie Dedrick6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMarilyn Weisenberg / Kara Beene vs Brenda Baril / Cindy Fancher2-6, 3-6
2024-10-24vs Sarasota/Deuitch/50&Over8.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesSally Alford / Kara Beene vs Maureen Thomas / Marjorie Petruccelli2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTami Dalto / Susan Marro vs Tracy Mediratta / Ana Areosa5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMary Wilson / Lisa Klemeyer vs Beth Costa / Lynn Deuitch7-5, 7-6
2024-10-17vs LWR NicholsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bright / Carrie Carretta vs Christie Boylston / Karen Nicholson6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSally Alford / Susan Marro vs Peggy Winsler / Gina Hagopian6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Wilson / SueAnn Sanders vs Kim Eck / Sheila Perry6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-10-03vs Sarasota/Deuitch/50&Over8.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bright / Carrie Carretta vs Susan Gammon / Ana Areosa6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMary Wilson / SueAnn Sanders vs Maureen Thomas / Marjorie Petruccelli0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSally Alford / Kara Beene vs Tracy Mediratta / Lynn Deuitch3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-09-29vs LWR NicholsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Wilson / SueAnn Sanders vs Lori Faunce / Sheila Perry7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarrie Carretta / Tami Dalto vs Christie Boylston / Karen Nicholson4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKara Beene / Sally Alford vs Elizabeth Green / Diana Stadelnikas6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Jennifer Bright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.21
Sally Alford
published
4.17
Tami Dalto
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Cindy Rosenberg
published 4
4.03
Michele Rose
published
3.98
Carrie Carretta
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.91
Kara Beene
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.76
Susan Marro
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.75
Lisa Klemeyer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Carla Rodman
published 4
SueAnn Sanders
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

SueAnn Sanders + Carrie Carretta10956% games+6.2% vs expected
Cindy Rosenberg + Carla Rodman4649% games+2.6% vs expected
SueAnn Sanders + Carla Rodman5553% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Bright + Kara Beene5066% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Bright + Carrie Carretta2349% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Rosenberg + Susan Marro224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Marro + Carla Rodman134 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Klemeyer + Tami Dalto033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Bright
100W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.23
Sally Alford
14W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Tami Dalto
54W–85L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
4.17
4
Cindy Rosenberg
81W–65L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
4.09
Michele Rose
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
4.03
4
Carrie Carretta
64W–42L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Kara Beene
240W–153L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Susan Marro
75W–69L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Lisa Klemeyer
54W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Carla Rodman
68W–105L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
SueAnn Sanders
181W–114L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.