Teams

Team Flam

2023 Loudoun Tri-Level 18 & Over Men · Loudoun Tri-Level 4.5,4.0,3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-04vs Team MaddiWon 10
W#1 DoublesChip Hathaway / Jagannath Chakravarty vs Rajakumar Chithambaram / Vineeth Murukuti6-3, 7-6
2023-11-21vs ChallengersWon 10
W#1 DoublesChip Hathaway / Jagannath Chakravarty vs Siddharth Muthiah / Sandipp Rou Perepu6-2, 6-3
2023-11-19vs The Swinging SultansWon 10
W#2 DoublesOliver Carter / Chip Hathaway vs Edward Xin / Lutz Braum7-5, 6-2
2023-11-16vs Team MaddiLost 01
L#2 DoublesJustin Lee / Matthew Schenk vs Rajakumar Chithambaram / Sriram Gopalakrishnan4-6, 3-6
2023-11-08vs The Swinging SultansLost 01
L#2 DoublesTodd Gordon / Matthew Schenk vs Jagannath Chakravarty / Edward Xin4-6, 4-6
2023-11-04vs Team MaddiLost 01
L#3 DoublesJaved Ahmed / Tommy Hyres vs THUC NGUYEN / Vijay Kalanadhabhatta3-6, 1-0
2023-10-17vs The Swinging SultansLost 01
L#3 DoublesTommy Hyres / Javed Ahmed vs Tusar Chhotaray / Scott Jacob6-0, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Tri-Level 4.5,4.0,3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Oliver Carter
published
4.25
Edward Brophy
published 4.5
4.11
Chip Hathaway
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.82
Matthew Schenk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Todd Gordon
published
3.32
Tommy Hyres
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
David Flam
published 3.5
Javed Ahmed
published
Jorge Prieto Choy
published
Lohit Palle
published
Vijay Shah
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Oliver Carter
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Edward Brophy
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
4.25
4.5
Chip Hathaway
207W–115L career · 3 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
4.11
4
Matthew Schenk
63W–46L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.82
Todd Gordon
9W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Tommy Hyres
59W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
David Flam
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.01
Javed Ahmed
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jorge Prieto Choy
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lohit Palle
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vijay Shah
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.