Teams

Seay/Orsak-Byrd M4.5

2024 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT M Saturday · M4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-03-02vs Huffhines/Reiman-Hong M4.5Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBen Jackson vs Jeffrey Jacobsen3-6, 1-6
2024-02-24vs LifeTime Plano/Fenter-Arcaria M4.5Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBen Jackson vs Ankur Baishya0-6, 4-6
2024-02-18vs Oak Creek/Bowman M4.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesBen Jackson vs Daniel Donati6-2, 6-0
2024-02-17Won 10
W#1 SinglesBen Jackson vs Roger Anderson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for M4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ben Jackson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Mark Woodling
published
4.17
Derek Hall
published 4.5
4.16
Jeff Darnell
published
4.16
Jeffrey Duffey
published
4.08
Paul Orsak
published
4.01
Austin McDaniel
published 4.5
4.01
Michael Byrd
published
3.99
Owen Morris
published
3.98
Scott Pollock
published
3.93
Laurence Newell
published
3.68
Dean McSherry
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Orsak + Michael Byrd111249% games−10.2% vs expected
Jeff Darnell + Derek Hall4155% gamesnot enough data
Derek Hall + Mark Woodling224 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Darnell + Mark Woodling123 matchesnot enough data
Derek Hall + Austin McDaniel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ben Jackson
12W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Woodling
12W–13L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Derek Hall
16W–18L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
4.17
Jeff Darnell
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
4.16
Jeffrey Duffey
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
4.16
Paul Orsak
16W–16L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.08
4.5
Austin McDaniel
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
4.01
Michael Byrd
15W–19L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
4.01
Owen Morris
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.99
Scott Pollock
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.98
Laurence Newell
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.93
4
Dean McSherry
16W–14L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.