Teams

Tuplano/Ostlund TBC

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 3.5 MEN

18 players · average NTRP 3.69 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-12-16Won 10
W#1 SinglesBrett Carlson vs Chris Parker6-1, 6-3
2024-11-25vs Benowitz: ORCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlejandro Trevino / Ryan Baisch vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesBrett Carlson vs Zachary Robins6-0, 7-6
2024-11-18vs Fermstad: DjokoGOATsLost 01
L#2 DoublesMatthew Ruble / Alejandro Trevino vs Scott Lundquist / Kaeden Erickson3-6, 0-6
2024-11-11vs Sandozi - Minnesota SliceSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJin Chang / Alexander Tang vs Nandan Raghavan / Tong Shen4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrett Carlson vs Michael Margulis3-6, 2-6
2024-11-04vs Jossi-Tennis Fall TeamWon 10
W#1 SinglesBrett Carlson vs Benji Mathews6-1, 6-3
2024-10-28vs Bogen ES 24Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJin Chang / Matthew Ruble vs Christopher Bogen / Keith Swift4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRyan Baisch / Alejandro Trevino vs Rob Stahley / Jason Reese6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-10-21vs Smetana-Fling MatchpointWon 20
W#1 DoublesBradford Richter / Jin Chang vs Taras Karkoc / Junkyu Kim6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesBrett Carlson vs Brian Rush6-4, 6-1
2024-10-14vs Jaspers - Highly StrungWon 50
W#1 DoublesMatthew Ruble / Alexander Tang vs Brett Meyer / Mark Meyer1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlexandr Weigel vs GAVIN HALLORAN6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaul Penningroth / Gene Scow vs Mark Bobnick / Arthur Saldana6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesBradford Richter vs Scott Tretter6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAustin Choe / Wilfert Long vs David Kanani / Kyle Bai6-0, 6-0
2024-10-07vs Christiansen - Non-PickleballersWon 10
W#3 DoublesMatthew Ruble / Alejandro Trevino vs Ed Andrist / ALTAF SHAIK6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Alexander Tang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Brett Carlson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.60
Ryan Baisch
published
3.60
Bradford Richter
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.57
Per Ostlund
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Alexandr Weigel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.50
Andrei Kittelson
published 3.5
3.46
Austin Choe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Wilfert Long
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Matthew Ruble
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Jin Chang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Jov Tuplano
published
3.23
David Rasmussen
published 3.5
3.17
Alejandro Trevino
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.16
Lawrence Wong
published
3.08
Gene Scow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Tim Theobald
published
Paul Penningroth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lawrence Wong + Gene Scow5650% games+5.5% vs expected
Jin Chang + Alejandro Trevino2443% gamesnot enough data
Lawrence Wong + Tim Theobald044 matchesnot enough data
David Rasmussen + Jin Chang303 matchesnot enough data
David Rasmussen + Andrei Kittelson303 matchesnot enough data
Jov Tuplano + Ryan Baisch213 matchesnot enough data
Alejandro Trevino + Matthew Ruble303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alexander Tang
51W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
3.5
Brett Carlson
84W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.63
Ryan Baisch
63W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
4
Bradford Richter
29W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.60
Per Ostlund
14W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Alexandr Weigel
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Andrei Kittelson
24W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Austin Choe
19W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Wilfert Long
17W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Matthew Ruble
42W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Jin Chang
134W–139L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Jov Tuplano
24W–22L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
David Rasmussen
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Alejandro Trevino
221W–280L career · 8 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Lawrence Wong
21W–20L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Gene Scow
16W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Tim Theobald
40W–41L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Paul Penningroth
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.