Teams

Kelly/Jacobson

2026 Anne Arundel Mixed 55 & Over · Anne Arundel Mixed 55 & Over 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-30vs Mixed MetaphorsWon 30
W#1 DoublesScott A Green / DIANE CASANOVA vs Richard Amos / Kristin Draper6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Cullins / George Sybert vs Yngrid Sierra / Scott Stickels7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLeann Gibbs / Michael Ritter vs Michael Smith / Wendy Hubbert6-0, 6-1
2026-08-27vs Mixed MetaphorsWon 21
W#1 DoublesMike Kelly / DIANE CASANOVA vs Andrew Mullins / Yngrid Sierra6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKaren Yannone / Scott A Green vs Shaun Edwards / Bonnie Catalano6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Jacobson / Michael McGowan vs Richard Amos / Wendy Hubbert6-3, 6-1
2026-08-25vs Mixed MetaphorsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMike Kelly / Leann Gibbs vs Andrew Mullins / Nona Pucciariello6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Yannone / George Sybert vs Michael Smith / Yngrid Sierra6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Bernhard / Cyndi Casey vs Scott Stickels / Karin Mottus6-0, 7-5
2026-08-06vs Mixed MetaphorsWon 21
W#1 DoublesDIANE CASANOVA / Mike Kelly vs William Willard / Nona Pucciariello6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Yannone / Michael Ritter vs Kristin Draper / Shaun Edwards4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Perkins / Michael Bernhard vs Kim Neiss / Karl Gordon6-1, 6-0
2026-08-02vs Mixed MetaphorsWon 30
W#1 DoublesDIANE CASANOVA / Stewart Royals vs James Appel / Laura Laabs6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathleen Cullins / Michael Ritter vs Karl Gordon / Karin Mottus6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Birnkammer / Michael Bernhard vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-27vs Mixed MetaphorsWon 30
W#1 DoublesScott A Green / Elizabeth Jacobson vs Richard Amos / Kim Neiss6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGeorge Sybert / Maria Birnkammer vs Andrew Mullins / Bonnie Catalano6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Ritter / Leann Gibbs vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-23vs Mixed MetaphorsWon 21
W#1 DoublesStewart Royals / DIANE CASANOVA vs William Willard / Nona Pucciariello2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Bernhard / Elizabeth Jacobson vs Shaun Edwards / Laura Laabs3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael McGowan / Karen Yannone vs Richard Amos / Bonnie Catalano6-4, 6-0
2026-07-19vs Mixed MetaphorsWon 30
W#1 DoublesCyndi Casey / Scott A Green vs Scott Stickels / Kim Neiss6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDIANE CASANOVA / Stewart Royals vs James Appel / Bonnie Catalano6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKathleen Cullins / Mike Kelly vs Karl Gordon / Wendy Hubbert6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Anne Arundel Mixed 55 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kelly/Jacobson50132670
2Mixed Metaphors0521327172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Stewart Royals
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Scott A Green
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Michael McGowan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Maria Birnkammer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
George Sybert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Michael Ritter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Greg Koch
published
3.32
Karen Yannone
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Leann Gibbs
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Michael Bernhard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Elizabeth Jacobson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Kathleen Cullins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Cyndi Casey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
DIANE CASANOVA
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Sarah Perkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stewart Royals + DIANE CASANOVA14460% games+8.5% vs expected
Scott A Green + Karen Yannone314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stewart Royals
70W–77L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Scott A Green
39W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.59
Michael McGowan
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Maria Birnkammer
97W–141L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
George Sybert
233W–163L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Michael Ritter
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Greg Koch
18W–8L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Karen Yannone
178W–151L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Leann Gibbs
98W–77L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
Michael Bernhard
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Elizabeth Jacobson
29W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Kathleen Cullins
63W–103L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Cyndi Casey
66W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
DIANE CASANOVA
123W–105L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Sarah Perkins
2W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.