Teams

X18 7.0 CC Dixon

2023 NEOTA Mixed 18 & Over Summer · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Mixed Summer

25 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-07-30vs X18 7.0 LT RugglesLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Wrubel / Narayan Viswanathan vs Ryoichi Fujiwara / Hannah Banas3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEvan Kuczynski / Anna Miller vs Ryan Garst / Kristin Lenton6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDeborah Rachek / Lohit Abhay Kumar vs Christina Reeves / Jeff Sterling3-6, 4-6
2023-07-23vs X18 7.0 MV2 HaughtWon 21
W#1 DoublesSriram Krishnan / Cheryl Chase vs Marisa Fiucci Rosen / Roy Showman6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Biegacki / Jaime Zimmerman vs Chuck Roman / Mary Wilburn6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesHangyu Choi / Darcie Hansen vs Robert Haught / Janeen Miklowski2-6, 4-6
2023-07-16vs X18 7.0 NC BullachWon 21
W#1 DoublesSURENDER VELUSAMY / Anna Miller vs Craig Warner / Michelle Ross6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAndrew Biegacki / Melissa Meisenbach vs Mark Caldwell / Anna Wright7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAlamelu Arakoni / Venkatraman Arakoni vs Molly White / Jose Carlos Corona4-6, 2-6
2023-07-09vs X18 7.0 TP RohrigSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGanapathi Narayanaswamy / Renee Downing vs John Consilio / Brooke Kaylor5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAlamelu Arakoni / Venkatraman Arakoni vs Robin Rohrig / Josh Derrig6-0, 6-4
2023-06-25vs X18 7.0 MV2 HaughtWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrew Biegacki / Jennifer Wrubel vs Lishan Zhang / Gary Fleming6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHangyu Choi / Colleen Rice vs Robert Haught / Marisa Fiucci Rosen1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBenjamin Moore / Melissa Meisenbach vs Kathleen Aranavage / Nicholas Fasola3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-06-11vs X18 7.0 LT RugglesWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrew Biegacki / Jaime Zimmerman vs Ryan Garst / Rebekka Hom7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPramod Padmanabhan / Renee Downing vs Jennifer Ruggles / Rob Rericha6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGanapathi Narayanaswamy / Colleen Rice vs Steve Gehring / Tracy Mathia6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-06-04vs X18 7.0 MV1 ConnellWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Wrubel / Sriram Krishnan vs David Blond / Holly Yotter3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCheryl Chase / Narayan Viswanathan vs Cyrus Bazljoo / Riley Mixon7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDeborah Rachek / Lohit Abhay Kumar vs George Raguz / Dongmei Zhang1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-21vs X18 7.0 GR NeelyWon 30
W#1 DoublesPramod Padmanabhan / Darcie Hansen vs Trisha Kohut / James McCans6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSamuel Samuel / Anna Miller vs Heidi MacLane-Hodges / William Burnett6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrian Razum / Colleen Rice vs Stephanie Dukeman / John Ragner7-5, 6-1
2023-05-14vs X18 7.0 NC BullachWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrew Biegacki / Jennifer Wrubel vs Rex Degler / Patricia Johnson6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSURENDER VELUSAMY / Colleen Rice vs William Arledge / Molly White6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCheryl Chase / Pramod Padmanabhan vs Michelle Ross / Mark Caldwell7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Mixed Summer have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Pramod Padmanabhan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jaime Zimmerman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Andrew Biegacki
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.48
Colleen Rice
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Christine Satariano
published 3.5
3.38
Venkatraman Arakoni
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Lohit Abhay Kumar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Jennifer Wrubel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Samuel Samuel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Evan Kuczynski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Anna Miller
published 3.5
Brian Razum
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Cheryl Chase
published 3.5
Hangyu Choi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Ganapathi Narayanaswamy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Narayan Viswanathan
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.23
Renee Downing
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Sriram Krishnan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Deborah Rachek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Alamelu Arakoni
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.94
Darcie Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.89
Melissa Meisenbach
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Deanne Dixon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Benjamin Moore
published
SURENDER VELUSAMY
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alamelu Arakoni + Venkatraman Arakoni2742% games−0.4% vs expected
Darcie Hansen + Hangyu Choi224 matchesnot enough data
Darcie Hansen + Pramod Padmanabhan314 matchesnot enough data
Alamelu Arakoni + Samuel Samuel314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pramod Padmanabhan
93W–46L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Jaime Zimmerman
22W–4L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Andrew Biegacki
33W–25L career · 7 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Colleen Rice
39W–17L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Christine Satariano
37W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.46
Venkatraman Arakoni
83W–64L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
Lohit Abhay Kumar
78W–76L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.37
Jennifer Wrubel
78W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
Samuel Samuel
38W–34L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Evan Kuczynski
20W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Anna Miller
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Brian Razum
13W–21L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Cheryl Chase
35W–57L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Hangyu Choi
27W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Ganapathi Narayanaswamy
51W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.25
Narayan Viswanathan
53W–43L career · 7 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Renee Downing
51W–45L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Sriram Krishnan
65W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%8%92%
3.18
3.5
Deborah Rachek
51W–75L career · 2 lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.13
3
Alamelu Arakoni
134W–84L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
3.5
Darcie Hansen
30W–61L career · 2 lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.94
Melissa Meisenbach
140W–114L career · 4 lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Deanne Dixon
27W–49L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Benjamin Moore
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
SURENDER VELUSAMY
56W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.