Teams

Duval/Stone

2026 Duval Adult 55 & Over - Women Winter · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over Winter - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-28vs Sawgrass - PetersWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaula Burdash / Aura Bernal vs Vanessa Sutliff / Heather Quick6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDiane Stone / Michelle Jahn vs Susan Reeves / Danielle Wright6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJUDITH DEVRIES / Vandi Cole vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-03-07vs PV - WahlWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Stone / Aura Bernal vs Libby Jones / MELINDA MCMANUS6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichelle Jahn / Elizabeth Messina vs Jane Wahl / Kate Clifford6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCherie Johnson / JUDITH DEVRIES vs Susan DePorre / Jodi Murphy3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-28vs Southside - ShumanWon 21
W#1 DoublesAura Bernal / Diane Stone vs Debbie Brooks / Svetlana Mityul6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Messina / Michelle Jahn vs Kelli Bushman / Lezita Davis5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesTammy Oswald / Cherie Johnson vs Shari Shuman / Donna Erenberg6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-02-21vs Sawgrass - PetersWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiane Stone / Tammy Oswald vs Aisling Toby / Peggy Fawcett6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Jahn / Elizabeth Messina vs Erica Chigounis / Trish Lang4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDonna Wilson / Anne Hoover vs Vanessa Sutliff / Danielle Wright6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-02-07vs PV - WahlWon 30
W#1 DoublesAura Bernal / Michelle Jahn vs Catherine Mitchell / MELINDA MCMANUS6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesVandi Cole / Elizabeth Messina vs Merlynn Kassing / Jenifer Landis2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiane Stone / Tammy Oswald vs Jan Alley / Kate Clifford6-2, 6-0
2026-01-31vs Sawgrass - PetersWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Messina / Michelle Jahn vs Robin Corley / Vanessa Sutliff6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAura Bernal / Diane Stone vs Heather Quick / Trish Lang6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTammy Oswald / Vandi Cole vs Francie Peters / Susan Reeves3-6, 5-7
2026-01-24vs Southside - ShumanWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaula Burdash / Aura Bernal vs Susan Herlong / Staci Hill6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesVandi Cole / Michelle Jahn vs Kelli Bushman / Julie Hoffman6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDonna Wilson / Anne Hoover vs Svetlana Mityul / Eleanor Mitchell6-2, 6-2
2026-01-10vs PV - WahlWon 21
L#1 DoublesPaula Burdash / Elizabeth Messina vs MELINDA MCMANUS / Libby Jones6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Stone / Aura Bernal vs Jan Alley / Jenifer Landis6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTammy Oswald / Vandi Cole vs Carolynn McMahan / Mary Anne Thomas6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over Winter - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Paula Burdash
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Michelle Jahn
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.40
Aura Bernal
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.38
Vandi Cole
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.38
Diane Stone
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.19
Tammy Oswald
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.17
Michelle Rawls
published
3.12
Elizabeth Messina
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Cherie Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Anne Hoover
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Donna Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
JUDITH DEVRIES
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Oswald + Vandi Cole7548% games−1.8% vs expected
Michelle Jahn + Elizabeth Messina3451% games−1.9% vs expected
Michelle Jahn + Diane Stone6357% games−4.4% vs expected
Elizabeth Messina + Diane Stone1436% gamesnot enough data
Aura Bernal + Diane Stone4158% gamesnot enough data
JUDITH DEVRIES + Cherie Johnson4159% gamesnot enough data
Paula Burdash + Aura Bernal314 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Jahn + Donna Wilson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paula Burdash
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Michelle Jahn
68W–143L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Aura Bernal
23W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Vandi Cole
78W–46L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Diane Stone
24W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Tammy Oswald
18W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Michelle Rawls
2W–11L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Elizabeth Messina
9W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cherie Johnson
8W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Anne Hoover
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
Donna Wilson
61W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
JUDITH DEVRIES
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.