Teams

Gordon 7.0

2022 Frederick Mixed 18 & Over · Frederick Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.88 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-02-08vs #TeamMillette 7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesBradley Jacques / Holly Erdely vs Millette Miller / Andy Blocker4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-01-24vs Dolan 7.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesBradley Jacques / Kimberly Price vs Sherri Capurso / Richard Lee6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-01-18vs #TeamMillette 7.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesJana Conigliaro / Dustin Wolf vs Christina Truax / Andrew Brammer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-01-15vs Dolan 7.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJana Conigliaro / MANJITHA WEERASINGHE vs Joshua Zoltek / Trisha Kinman4-6, 5-7
2022-01-13vs Dolan 7.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesJana Conigliaro / Jatin Chhabra vs Joshua Zoltek / Trisha Kinman6-4, 7-5
2022-01-04vs #TeamMillette 7.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJana Conigliaro / Chinthaka Vithanage vs Millette Miller / Jose Miguel Sacin3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Jana Conigliaro
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published 4
3.75
Lacey Gordon
published
3.74
Winny Zhang
published
3.63
3.59
Bradley Jacques
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.46
Jatin Chhabra
published
3.30
Traci Bidinger
published
3.12
Pamela Lotinsky
published
3.08
Holly Erdely
published 3.5
2.88
Kimberly Price
published
Robert Nickey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bradley Jacques + Lacey Gordon033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jana Conigliaro
267W–142L career · 13 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
Lacey Gordon
7W–14L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
Winny Zhang
19W–18L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Christine Pagendarm
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Bradley Jacques
192W–208L career · 5 lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.59
Jatin Chhabra
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
Traci Bidinger
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
3.30
Pamela Lotinsky
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Holly Erdely
78W–102L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Kimberly Price
0W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
Robert Nickey
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.