Teams

DHenley-HVCC

2025 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Men Evening

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-01vs JByrd-ENOLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrew Freedman / Justin Nixon vs Bongsang Cho / Olimani Deivasigamani2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-03-25vs SPerian-ENOLost 01
L#2 DoublesJustin Nixon / Bryson Powell vs Amit Kumar / Praveen Yadav3-6, 2-6
2025-03-18vs APineda-CHTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesJustin Nixon / Bryson Powell vs Terrence Tan / Paul Snow6-1, 7-5
2025-02-25vs DBaddour-CHCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesJustin Nixon / Bryson Powell vs Niels Lameijer / William Enright6-2, 6-2
2025-02-18vs EShen-EPHWon 21
W#1 DoublesWilliam Lucas / Benjamin Perry vs JAMES MONTAGUE / David Schumann7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSean Selig vs Juan Andrade4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRICHARD GRIFFIN / Paul Klenk vs Eric Shen / Dan Dillon6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Justin Nixon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Bayard Collins
published 4
3.67
Bryson Powell
published 4
3.66
Benjamin Perry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
William Yancy
published
3.61
RICHARD GRIFFIN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Alex Herzick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.56
Sean Selig
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.48
Paul Klenk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
William Hodges
published
3.35
John Burkert
published
3.26
Chris Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Benjamin Feldman
published 3.5
3.06
Andrew Freedman
published 3.5
Walker Harris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Hamilton + Alex Herzick4157% games+1.5% vs expected
Justin Nixon + Alex Herzick314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Justin Nixon
43W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Bayard Collins
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Bryson Powell
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Benjamin Perry
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
William Yancy
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
RICHARD GRIFFIN
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.61
3.5
Alex Herzick
14W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
Sean Selig
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.56
Paul Klenk
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
William Hodges
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
John Burkert
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Chris Hamilton
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Benjamin Feldman
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Andrew Freedman
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Walker Harris
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.