Teams

Chapman 40 4.5 Mixed

2025 Piedmont Mixed Doubles 40 · 4.5 Mxd Tues

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-03vs Belangia 40 4.5 MixedLost 01
L#1 DoublesJason Kinder / Brandy Kmiec vs Lowry Liggon / Adam Dailey0-1
2025-08-03vs Belangia 40 4.5 MixedWon 10
W#3 DoublesJason Kinder / Brandy Kmiec vs Lowry Liggon / Adam Dailey8-4
2025-08-03vs Belangia 40 4.5 MixedLost 03
L#1 DoublesThanawan Hahn / Brooks Jackson vs Janice Henslee / David Leatherwood6-8
L#2 DoublesMichael Davis / Jane Owens vs Kelly Gaines / Jonathan Sawyer6-8
L#3 DoublesDenise Speight / Zachary Tran vs Kenny Winter / Jennifer Smith8-9
2025-07-25vs Belangia 40 4.5 MixedWon 10
W#3 DoublesSunny Bowers / Jason Woodsby vs Janice Henslee / Chuck Burns8-1
2025-07-25vs Belangia 40 4.5 MixedWon 10
W#2 DoublesSunny Bowers / Jason Woodsby vs Janice Henslee / Chuck Burns8-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Mxd Tues have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Denise Speight
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.42
Sunny Bowers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.40
Jason Woodsby
published
4.36
Tiffany Brown
published
4.34
Brandy Kmiec
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.31
Jason Kinder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.30
Zachary Tran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.29
Thanawan Hahn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Derek Main
published 4.5
4.21
Bryan Vescio
published 4.5
4.13
Brooks Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Jane Owens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Denise Speight
17W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%28%
4.43
Sunny Bowers
50W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.42
Jason Woodsby
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.40
Tiffany Brown
15W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
4.36
4.5
Brandy Kmiec
107W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Jason Kinder
157W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.31
Zachary Tran
23W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
4.30
Thanawan Hahn
23W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Derek Main
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Bryan Vescio
37W–17L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Brooks Jackson
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.13
Jane Owens
13W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.