Teams

SDNC 4.0 Morgan Run/ Manheim (3:2)

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC · SDNC - Men - 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.86 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCraig Shugert / Joe Manheim vs David Yang / Changhua Ji3-6, 4-6
2022-06-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesRob Denny / Joe Manheim vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-29vs SDNC 4.0 RBCTC/ Brindle (3:2)Split 11
L#2 DoublesTim MacDonald / Joe Manheim vs Jonathan Brindle / Glenn Sherman5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJason Graves / Seth Mullen vs Blake Foster / Robert May4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRob Denny / Joe Manheim vs Edwin Abadilla / Matthew Brush6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRMichael Gendreau / Joe Manheim vs Nathan Adelman / Pete Zielinski6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesSeth Mullen / Jason Graves vs Anthony Villasenor / Karl Kasai7-6, 7-6
L#2 SinglesSeth Mullen vs Vitor Roque6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-03Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRob Denny / Joe Manheim vs Scott Hansen / Eric Wang4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Charles Rogers
published 4
3.88
Seth Mullen
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Craig Shugert
published 4
3.75
Jason Graves
published
3.73
Jack Steenstra
published 4
3.71
John Jastremski
published
3.68
Ray Adams
published
3.58
Hartley Miller
published 3.5
3.53
Tim MacDonald
published
3.43
Joe Manheim
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.24
Bob Boehnlein
published 3.5
Marvin Pantangco
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Seth Mullen + Jack Steenstra2347% gamesnot enough data
Seth Mullen + Charles Rogers5066% gamesnot enough data
Joe Manheim + Tim MacDonald224 matchesnot enough data
Joe Manheim + Jack Steenstra134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charles Rogers
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Seth Mullen
108W–80L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Craig Shugert
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jason Graves
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Jack Steenstra
34W–38L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
John Jastremski
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Ray Adams
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Hartley Miller
13W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
3.58
Tim MacDonald
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Joe Manheim
119W–159L career · 6 lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.43
3.5
Bob Boehnlein
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Marvin Pantangco
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.