Teams

Ewing/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-13vs Walton/MemphisLost 13
L#1 SinglesMichelle Ragan vs Lindsey Myers4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesGaby Orta / Stefenie Block vs Carrie Anderson / Rebekah Sudduth6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesSally Gillum vs Julie Little1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAmi Tasker / Kara Richetti vs FELICIA HAUSER / Frannie Franks6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2025-11-06vs Galdieri/MemphisSplit 22
L#1 SinglesKara Richetti vs Carolyn Labonia1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHallie Bauer / Michelle Ragan vs Paige Swanquist / Deena Knight2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesNancy Chandrasekaran vs Diana Galdieri6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAmi Tasker / Sally Gillum vs Kristie Miller Ford / Shawnelle Davis6-1, 7-5
2025-11-04vs Walton/MemphisLost 13
L#1 SinglesNancy Chandrasekaran vs Julie Little1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesHallie Bauer / Michelle Ragan vs FELICIA HAUSER / Christy Murphey6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesSally Gillum vs Alison Elkington6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStefenie Block / Gaby Orta vs Brittany Glisson / Janie Beanblossom4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-10-30vs Babcock/MemphisLost 05
L#1 DoublesAmi Tasker / Tanya Myers vs Maryellen Tabor / Jill Bishop6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesHallie Bauer vs Ashley Matthews1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesStefenie Block / Gaby Orta vs Elizabeth Babcock / Claudia Ziegler1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMichelle Ragan vs Teri Hirt3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSally Gillum / Nancy Chandrasekaran vs Glaucia Novoa / Ana Paula Pereira6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-10-27vs Thompson/MemphisLost 13
L#1 DoublesTanya Myers / Ami Tasker vs Emily Sadlow / Rachel Montague5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNancy Chandrasekaran vs Elizabeth Langley0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesStefenie Block / Gaby Orta vs Jami Feinberg / Anne von Lanken4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesCaitlyn Arkwright vs Melanie Schrank6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-10-23vs Brkic/MemphisWon 41
W#1 DoublesAmi Tasker / Tanya Myers vs Sonya Fleck / Charissa Derieg6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCaitlyn Arkwright vs Jamie Harris6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHallie Bauer / Michelle Ragan vs Lisa McIntosh / Tracy Lombardo7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesNancy Chandrasekaran vs Nicole Brkic1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesStefenie Block / Gaby Orta vs Julie Upchurch / Kelcie Nollner6-1, 6-3
2025-10-09vs Churchey/MemphisLost 23
L#1 DoublesHallie Bauer / Nancy Chandrasekaran vs Kristina Dell'Orco / Cheryl Murphy0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCaitlyn Arkwright vs Karen Franklin6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTanya Myers / Ami Tasker vs Susan Dacus / Jennifer Musgrave6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesStefenie Block vs Maggie Lee6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSally Gillum / Gaby Orta vs Debbie Churchey / Brooke Smith1-6, 2-6
2025-10-02vs Thompson/MemphisLost 13
L#1 SinglesHallie Bauer vs Melissa Sherrod2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStefenie Block / Michelle Ragan vs Betsy Brown / Elza McKenna2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKara Richetti vs Allison Jones0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Chandrasekaran / Sally Gillum vs Jami Feinberg / Christine Ohrberg6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Tanya Myers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.89
Ami Tasker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Sally Gillum
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.79
Michelle Ragan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
2.78
Stefenie Block
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Caitlyn Arkwright
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3
2.71
Gaby Orta
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.62
Nancy Chandrasekaran
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.60
Hallie Bauer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.39
Kara Richetti
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanya Myers + Ami Tasker211454% games+6.0% vs expected
Gaby Orta + Sally Gillum2347% games−1.0% vs expected
Stefenie Block + Gaby Orta2348% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Ragan + Stefenie Block134 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Ragan + Hallie Bauer213 matchesnot enough data
Stefenie Block + Hallie Bauer033 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Chandrasekaran + Sally Gillum123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tanya Myers
24W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.92
3
Ami Tasker
27W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Sally Gillum
23W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Michelle Ragan
18W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Stefenie Block
18W–40L career · 11 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Caitlyn Arkwright
14W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
Gaby Orta
11W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Nancy Chandrasekaran
11W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
2.62
Hallie Bauer
9W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Kara Richetti
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.