Teams

SFV - Chicks With Sticks 3.0

2024 Adult 18+ SFV Spring · SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.10 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-13vs SFV - RacketeersWon 10
W#3 DoublesVenita Ryan / Teresa Hatch vs Liberty Peralta / Jacqueline Hantgan6-1, 6-0
2024-07-12vs SFV - Nikki's Tennis Crew 3.0 WLost 01
L#1 SinglesRenee Volpei vs Tiffany O'Hara0-6, 1-6
2024-06-08vs SFV - Simply Smashing 3.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesRenee Volpei vs Francesca Ricagni0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesChristina Pula / Venita Ryan vs Allison Mac Ewan / Bethany Nelson6-1, 6-4
2024-05-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDeidre Hope / Venita Ryan vs Kara Smith / Annie Dang0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesVenita Ryan / Leslie Byrum vs Ginny Than / Cheryl Stolarski6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Renee Volpei
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Venita Ryan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.99
Nicole Romanelli
published
2.94
Kathryn Stefani
published
2.88
Hanan Asfoury
published
2.86
Amy Randles
published 3
2.83
Julie Whitmer
published
2.80
Teresa Hatch
published
2.79
Deidre Hope
published 3
2.78
Leslie Byrum
published
2.59
Jenny Killgore
published
2.55
Cherie Lakin
published 3
2.55
Penny Oxciano
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deidre Hope + Venita Ryan3546% games+7.8% vs expected
Venita Ryan + Nicole Romanelli14658% games+7.1% vs expected
Kathryn Stefani + Julie Whitmer5063% games+6.2% vs expected
Renee Volpei + Venita Ryan16760% games+2.7% vs expected
Deidre Hope + Julie Whitmer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Renee Volpei
93W–52L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.32
3
Venita Ryan
128W–97L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.02
Nicole Romanelli
29W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
Kathryn Stefani
13W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
Hanan Asfoury
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Amy Randles
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
Julie Whitmer
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Teresa Hatch
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
2.80
3
Deidre Hope
20W–18L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Leslie Byrum
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Jenny Killgore
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
26%73%<1%
2.59
3
Cherie Lakin
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
Penny Oxciano
8W–19L career · no lines in 2024
0%37%63%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.