Teams

UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 40AW3.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-22vs MITCHELL PK 40AW3.0ASplit 22
L#1 DoublesMichelle Dike / Elizabeth Olson vs Elaine Kwok / Hyeyun Jeong4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJIA CHEN vs Youjin Kim6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKerry Loftus / Amanda Ross vs Jihea Han / Eunhee Kang6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLeah Caldarone / Lauren Williams vs Chi Buckley / Ji Yeun Lee1-6, 1-6
2025-02-09vs MITCHELL PK 40AW3.0ALost 13
L#1 DoublesViviane Bahia / Yvonne Roth vs Lizhen Yu / Jiyoun Noh2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLeah Caldarone vs Hyeyun Jeong2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAmanda Ross / Michelle Dike vs Ali Kwon / Ashley Unyoung Kim6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKristina Hehrne / Nancy Rosenthal vs Eunhee Kang / Eunha Kim4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Viviane Bahia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Kerry Loftus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Amanda Ross
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Elizabeth Olson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
JIA CHEN
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.98
Michelle Dike
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Leah Caldarone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.72
Yvonne Roth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Trish Collins
published
2.56
Kristina Hehrne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Sara Rao
published
2.31
Stephanie Frick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Olson + Kerry Loftus3348% games−0.7% vs expected
Elizabeth Olson + Amanda Ross314 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Ross + Kerry Loftus314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Viviane Bahia
42W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Kerry Loftus
17W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Amanda Ross
35W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Elizabeth Olson
30W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
JIA CHEN
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Michelle Dike
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Leah Caldarone
3W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Yvonne Roth
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Trish Collins
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%9%91%
2.69
Kristina Hehrne
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%34%66%
2.56
Sara Rao
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%65%35%
2.45
Stephanie Frick
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.