← Teams

SHC-McCroskey

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.31 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Adrian Polliack
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.22
Steve Fogg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Brian Dehen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.18
Honorato Wenceslao
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4.5
4.13
Jon Monson
published 4.5
3.82
Jeroen Swanborn
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
—
Jason Crawford
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.66
Pete Stirling
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
—
Adam Buchwald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 0
Results12 ties
2023-10-01Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesJeroen Swanborn / Katherine Farrell vs Daniel Lamey / Linda Barr1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-09-30Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesJeroen Swanborn / Katherine Farrell vs Holly Anderson / Rick Anderson7-6, 6-3
2023-06-24Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJoseph Collins / Jeroen Swanborn vs Scott Rutherford / James Stelson6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2023-06-10Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesSteve Fogg / Honorato Wenceslao vs Sherwood Newell / David Sturdyvin7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAdrian Polliack / Michael Laport vs Todd Klindt / Colin Arnold6-2, 6-3
2023-06-03Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJason Crawford / Hector M Salomon vs Jeb Hubbs / Jeremy Morris6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRichard Jackson / Jeroen Swanborn vs Bruce Sylva / Ke Ounaphom6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAdrian Polliack / Honorato Wenceslao vs John Bard / Toby Krauel6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-05-21Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesAdrian Polliack / Steve Fogg vs Christopher Haddon / Mark Simpson1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-05-13Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJeroen Swanborn / Brian Dehen vs Dirk Koopman / Daniel Larsen6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJohn McCroskey / Jason Crawford vs Greg Masson / Brad Miller6-3, 6-2
2023-05-07Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesSteve Fogg / Honorato Wenceslao vs Marc Milobinski / Frank Collie6-0, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeroen Swanborn / John McCroskey vs Arthur Kowitch / Chris Merrill6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrian Dehen / Charles Lessmann vs Matthew Condit / Bart Borosky3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-05-05Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesSteve Fogg / Honorato Wenceslao vs Mike McNairy / Josiah Whitman6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-29Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesSteve Fogg / Adrian Polliack vs Jim Rankin / Michael Sather7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHonorato Wenceslao vs Yascha Noonberg7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAdam Buchwald / Mikal Rahman vs Butch Dela Cruz / Steve Vanderploeg7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeroen Swanborn / Richard Jackson vs Steve Eggerts / Ken Nichols6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-21Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesJason Crawford / Pete Stirling vs Marc DeSantis / Matt Chesley6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-16Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesSteve Fogg / Honorato Wenceslao vs Justin Shull / Jan Wich-Herrlein6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Dehen / Adrian Polliack vs Kevin Vedder / Deepak Kumar6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Adrian Polliack
16W–21L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Steve Fogg
84W–67L career
0%99%1%
4.22
4.5
Brian Dehen
29W–44L career
7%87%6%
4.19
4.5
Honorato Wenceslao
128W–74L career
1%99%0%
4.18
4.5
Jon Monson
112W–41L career
2%98%0%
4.13
4
Jeroen Swanborn
67W–46L career
0%98%2%
3.82
4
Jason Crawford
33W–25L career
not enough data
—
4
Pete Stirling
23W–16L career
7%93%0%
3.66
0
Adam Buchwald
4W–7L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.