Teams

WNCG Anderson (HRC)

Adult 65 & Over USTA WNC 2025 · 65 & O 3.0 women Monday morning

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 65 & O 3.0 women Monday morning have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Gay Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Heather North
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Christina Phan
published 3
2.81
Loretta Arrington
published
2.79
Anna Kemper
published 3
2.77
Margaret Peggy Sanders
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.76
Debra Highsmith
published 3
Holly Roe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
JoAnne Dougher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Barbara Weinland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Marlene Rau
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gay Anderson + Heather North5456% games+7.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Gay Anderson
17W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Heather North
15W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Christina Phan
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Loretta Arrington
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Anna Kemper
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
Margaret Peggy Sanders
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Debra Highsmith
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Holly Roe
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
JoAnne Dougher
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Barbara Weinland
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Marlene Rau
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.