Teams

Yadkin/Howard/18+3.5

2025 Yadkin Valley Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men-Thursday (night)

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-24vs Coordinator/Club TeamWon 21
L#1 DoublesManuel Gimeno Amoros / Blake Suess vs Lyle Paukner / Michael Fulks6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJeff Clay vs Bradin Routh6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJacobo Araujo Nieto vs Matthias Von Feilitzsch6-1, 6-1
2025-04-03vs Coordinator/Club TeamSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJacobo Araujo Nieto / Blake Suess vs Bradin Routh / Lyle Paukner6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesManuel Gimeno Amoros vs Vance Faulkner6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDavid Crews vs Logan Shuping2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPaul Howard / David Draper vs Preston Barber / Brad Poindexter2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-03-13vs Coordinator/Club TeamWon 40
W#1 DoublesFelipe Rivas / Manuel Gimeno Amoros vs Bradin Routh / Lyle Paukner6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPaul Gregory / Blake Suess vs CJ Hines / Austin Temple6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJeff Clay vs Preston Barber6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPaul Howard / David Draper vs John Wilson / Brad Poindexter6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men-Thursday (night) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Felipe Rivas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Jeff Clay
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Jacobo Araujo Nieto
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Austin Johnson
published 3.5
3.12
David Crews
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
3.00
Blake Suess
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.98
David Draper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Manuel Gimeno Amoros
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Gaither Jenkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacobo Araujo Nieto + Jeff Clay033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Felipe Rivas
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Jeff Clay
37W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Jacobo Araujo Nieto
16W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Austin Johnson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
David Crews
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
3
Blake Suess
23W–5L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3.5
David Draper
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Manuel Gimeno Amoros
14W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.90
Gaither Jenkins
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.