Teams

WIKIUP R SC 18AM4.0A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-06-02vs LA CANTERA RC 18AM4.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesWeldon Ryckman / Brian Johnson vs Peter Magrini / Yanzhu Wen4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-04-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Johnson / Jon Moens vs Brandon Hill / Douglas Fladseth6-4, 6-2
2024-04-20vs GALVIN PK 18AM4.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesGeoff Scott / Brian Johnson vs Mike Richter / Seth Petersen6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Jamin Ruark
published 4
3.98
Roy Peterka
published
3.96
Brian Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #1 Singles 23% · published 4
3.92
Daniel Johnson
published 4
3.91
Chris Trechter
published 4
3.88
Weldon Ryckman
published
3.87
Tom Frisher
published
3.85
Brad Swadling
published 4
3.81
Nathan Strong
published
Douglas Oclassen
published 4
3.73
Jon Moens
published
3.60
Aaron King
published 3.5
Casey Caldwell
published 3.5
Razi Arifuddin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roy Peterka + Nathan Strong11065% games+10.8% vs expected
Brad Swadling + Jamin Ruark404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jamin Ruark
21W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.98
Roy Peterka
14W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Brian Johnson
77W–55L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Daniel Johnson
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Chris Trechter
11W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
Weldon Ryckman
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.88
Tom Frisher
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Brad Swadling
18W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
3.85
Nathan Strong
14W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Douglas Oclassen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jon Moens
10W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Aaron King
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.60
3.5
Casey Caldwell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Razi Arifuddin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.