Teams

Eppler/55/3.5/MXD/BTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Mixed 55 & Over · 3.5 Shrev

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-07vs Cummer/55/3.5/MXD/POTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesTodd Eppler / Kim Kitchens vs Ramin Zamani / Laquita Briggs6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Lettow / Judy Tabor vs Mike Hicks / Dana Hicks7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDennis Alexander / Lora Slack vs Stephen Craig / Parisa Zamani6-3, 6-0
2025-05-10vs Cummer/55/3.5/MXD/POTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesEddie Holman / Nancy Devers vs Julie Spano / Woodie Huffman2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJason Taravella / Judy Tabor vs Robin Harris / Mark Roberts6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDwayne Slack / Kim Kitchens vs Tammy Roberts / Stephen Craig6-0, 6-0
2025-04-27vs Cummer/55/3.5/MXD/POTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesEddie Holman / Nancy Devers vs Julie Spano / Woodie Huffman6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Lettow / Judy Tabor vs Susan McClendon / Brad McClendon6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTodd Eppler / Michelle Cavanaugh vs Parisa Zamani / Ramin Zamani6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Todd Eppler
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Eddie Holman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Dwayne Slack
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Michelle Cavanaugh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Jason Taravella
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Judy Tabor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Dennis Alexander
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Lora Slack
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Kim Kitchens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Glenda Marsh
published
3.10
Nancy Devers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Lettow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Todd Eppler
38W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Eddie Holman
25W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Dwayne Slack
25W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Michelle Cavanaugh
18W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Jason Taravella
25W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
Judy Tabor
30W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Dennis Alexander
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lora Slack
34W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Kim Kitchens
19W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Glenda Marsh
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Nancy Devers
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
Robert Lettow
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.