Teams

Gibson-Camp Creek

2024 OWB Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.58 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-10-16vs Edmonds-Rosemary BeachWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarol Block / Sandra Putz vs Nora Cyr / LeAnne Shumate6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCindy Holditch / Courtney Johnson vs Ashley Edmonds / Lindy Wood6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPamm Chapman / Diana Hundley vs Laurie Brown / Michelle Asbell6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Sandra Putz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Courtney Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Patricia Sherrod
published
3.45
MISSY HANNAHAN
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Bailey Quirk
published 3.5
3.39
Veronica Gray
published
3.33
Sherry Dennis
published
3.29
Angie Gibson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Summer King
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Cindy Holditch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Diana Hundley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Pamm Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Carol Block
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Jennifer Geoghagan
published
3.00
Jacqueline Ward
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kristine Cox
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandra Putz
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Courtney Johnson
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Sherrod
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.51
MISSY HANNAHAN
12W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Bailey Quirk
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
3.44
Veronica Gray
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
Sherry Dennis
46W–59L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.33
3.5
Angie Gibson
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Summer King
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Cindy Holditch
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Diana Hundley
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Pamm Chapman
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Carol Block
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
Jennifer Geoghagan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.16
Jacqueline Ward
24W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
Kristine Cox
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.