Teams

The Mojitos

2022 Montgomery Combo Winter · Montgomery Combo Winter 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-04-05vs PapadropshotsWon 10
W#3 DoublesAlison Serino / Nancy Trimble vs Angela Ferguson / Joanne Rome6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-01vs MaciaWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlison Serino / Mary Ellen Staggers vs Rebecca Hammond / Michie Dinger5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-26vs RubinoLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlison Serino / Melissa Hayes-Gehrke vs Michelle Stas / Shan Wang3-6, 2-6
2022-03-17vs PapadropshotsWon 20
W#1 DoublesCecilia Jones / Alison Serino vs Kerry Spicer / Millette Miller6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPolyxena Speros / Nancy Trimble vs Jayne Korolkoff / Joanne Rome5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-11vs RubinoWon 10
W#1 DoublesShalen Fairbanks / Alison Serino vs Tria Thalman / Nancy Cooper6-4, 7-5
2022-03-08vs MaciaLost 01
L#2 DoublesShalen Fairbanks / Nancy Trimble vs Carol Gover / Heather Schreiber2-6, 4-6
2022-03-03vs RubinoLost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy Trimble / Shalen Fairbanks vs Nicola Goren / Tria Thalman0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Henmueller / Alison Serino vs Michelle Stas / Shan Wang6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2022-02-26vs PapadropshotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesCecilia Jones / Nancy Trimble vs Ashley Htay-Huynh / Mary Beth Etherton6-1, 6-4
2022-02-11vs RubinoWon 10
W#3 DoublesAlison Serino / Polyxena Speros vs Frances Brennan / Margaret Rubino7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Winter 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Cecilia Jones
published 4
3.63
Laura Henmueller
published 4
3.49
Alison Serino
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.47
Shalen Fairbanks
published
3.33
Desiree Nichtula
published 3.5
3.17
Darcie Hammer
published 3.5
2.95
Nancy Trimble
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.81
Katya White
published
Polyxena Speros
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Trimble + Alison Serino3349% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Trimble + Laura Henmueller123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cecilia Jones
48W–52L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Laura Henmueller
121W–170L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Alison Serino
162W–124L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
Shalen Fairbanks
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Desiree Nichtula
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Darcie Hammer
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Nancy Trimble
252W–415L career · 5 lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
Melissa Hayes-Gehrke
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
2.81
Katya White
27W–33L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Polyxena Speros
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.