Teams

1-SRYAN-CHTC

2023 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Men-Evening

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-04vs 3-ELindblom-EnoLost 01
L#3 DoublesTimothy Buckley / Gary Glish vs Eric Lindblom / Richard Griffin2-6, 3-6
2023-04-25vs 4-EAnderson-DFCLost 01
L#3 DoublesScott Williams / Gary Glish vs Jason Liss / Debu Purohit3-6, 1-6
2023-03-21vs 4-EAnderson-DFCLost 01
L#3 DoublesGary Glish / Stephen Ryan vs Stephen Bayer / Brandon Garrett5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2023-03-09vs 6-DHenley-HVCCLost 01
L#3 DoublesGary Glish / Jacob Godfrey vs Benjamin Feldman / Douglas Henley4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Men-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Wendell Gilland
published
3.66
Terrence Tan
published
3.65
JOE BERTON
published
3.63
Stephen Stark
published
3.40
Randy Cubrilovic
published
3.34
Jacob Godfrey
published
3.32
Dan Tudor
published 3.5
3.29
Bob Stocking
published 3.5
3.27
Gary Glish
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.26
Jeffrey Kopf
published
3.21
Timothy Buckley
published
3.18
Mark Higuchi
published
Stephen Ryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Kopf + Gary Glish123 matchesnot enough data
Terrence Tan + Wendell Gilland123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wendell Gilland
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.75
Terrence Tan
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.66
JOE BERTON
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
Stephen Stark
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.63
Randy Cubrilovic
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.40
Jacob Godfrey
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Dan Tudor
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Bob Stocking
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Gary Glish
140W–124L career · 9 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Jeffrey Kopf
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.26
Timothy Buckley
16W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Mark Higuchi
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Stephen Ryan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.