Teams

Team 1 Balls Out

2024 NOVA Mixed 40 & Over · NOVA Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.42 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-09vs Team 6 Net DancersLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Evans / Lisa Stock-Reusch vs XIAOZHEN LIN / YANG LIU5-7, 2-0
2024-06-03vs Team 11 HighStrungLost 01
L#1 DoublesDrew Meren / Mary Tisch vs Douglas Levy / Julie Moellering6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-05-22vs Team 8 Serves You RightLost 01
L#1 DoublesJerien Okoh-Tisch / Robert Evans vs Eve Pandit / Sebastian Weathersby7-5, 3-5, 0-1
2024-05-11vs Team 3 PiF 40 (7.0)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSueyun Hsieh / James Knowles vs Sheryl Morley / Chip Hathaway1-6, 1-6
2024-05-05vs Team 13 Smart AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesLarry Brown / Lisa Stock-Reusch vs Brian Barnett / Kristi Nault3-6, 1-6
2024-04-28vs Team 12 CourtmastersWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Stock-Reusch / Robert Evans vs Irena Bucci / Ryan Poole4-6, 5-5
2024-04-07vs Team 10 Viva 40 +Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSueyun Hsieh / Matt Fullerty vs Joan Kissal / Jin Kim6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 40 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Jerien Okoh-Tisch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Sueyun Hsieh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.58
Lisa Stock-Reusch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.15
Tiffany Malloy
published
2.88
James Knowles
published
2.86
Mary Tisch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Robert Evans
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.64
Alberto Zapata
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Evans + Mary Tisch7944% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jerien Okoh-Tisch
122W–86L career · type A · 1 line in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
3.5
Sueyun Hsieh
141W–113L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.60
4
Lisa Stock-Reusch
62W–104L career · 3 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.58
Tiffany Malloy
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
James Knowles
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Mary Tisch
71W–105L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Robert Evans
30W–53L career · type M · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Alberto Zapata
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
2.64
Magdalena Lewandowski
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.