Teams

Team Baldino (CONFIRMED)

USTA Atlanta Summer - Combo Doubles 18 & Over Qualifier · 6.5 Women (Fowler Park)

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-09vs USTA Atlanta/Dana HarveyLost 12
L#1 DoublesJamie Dennis / Sandy McQueen vs Dana Harvey / Brilynn Fields3-8
L#2 DoublesDebra Kading / Soo Monahon vs Susan Norton / Adrienne Wise4-8
W#3 DoublesKimberly Moyer / Kari Jacobson vs Erica Ankrom / Nayasha Mendez9-8
2025-08-09vs Team Terry (CONFIRMED)Won 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Moyer / Soo Monahon vs Renee Arnold / Heather Musman8-1
W#2 DoublesAmber Baldino / Wyndy Taylor vs Lisa Bacote / Melanie Rezaie8-1
L#3 DoublesJamie Dennis / Angela Medeiros vs Melissa Bader / Leisa Johnson7-9
2025-08-09vs Team Tucker (CONFIRMED)Won 30
W#1 DoublesKimberly Moyer / Kari Jacobson vs Kara Tucker / Rachel Rucker8-2
W#2 DoublesAmber Baldino / Sandy McQueen vs Olivia Haney / Kayla Rose9-7
W#3 DoublesDebra Kading / Angela Medeiros vs Nicki Price / Megan Cambre8-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women (Fowler Park) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Sandy McQueen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Soo Monahon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Kari Jacobson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Wyndy Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Debra Kading
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Angela Medeiros
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Ran Tao
published
3.00
Amber Baldino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Kimberly Moyer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jamie Dennis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ran Tao + Amber Baldino213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandy McQueen
71W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.72
Soo Monahon
68W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.66
Kari Jacobson
21W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Wyndy Taylor
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Debra Kading
14W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Angela Medeiros
26W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
Ran Tao
28W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Amber Baldino
44W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Kimberly Moyer
32W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Jamie Dennis
14W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.