Teams

MSIL 3.5M A18&O Soltys-Quincy

2022 MSIL Adult 18 & Over - MSIL West League · West MSIL A18 & Over 3.5M

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-16vs MSIL 3.5M A18&O Comte-BloomingtonLost 14
L#1 DoublesDavid Oakley / Joseph Laws vs Nick Benson / Matt Modrusic6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDouglas Mallett vs D Comte2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBob Soltys / James Pitney vs Shishir Pandey / Rajeev Maddipati3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesRick Crider vs Craig Conway6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRobert Catalpa / Bryant Alexandre vs Jason Collins / Joseph McCarron6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2022-07-16vs MSIL 3.5M A18&O Comte-BloomingtonWon 31
L#1 DoublesDavid Oakley / Rick Crider vs Nick Benson / Matt Modrusic6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJoseph Laws vs Shishir Pandey6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBob Soltys / Douglas Mallett vs Jason Collins / D Comte4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJames Pitney / Robert Catalpa vs Craig Conway / Joseph McCarron7-6, 2-3
2022-07-09vs MSIL 3.5M A18&O Wang-PeoriaWon 32
W#1 DoublesDouglas Mallett / Joseph Laws vs Joe Mulcahey / Erik Siembab6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMartin McCarthy vs Roger Bruere4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBryan Fasano / Bob Soltys vs Madhu Reddy / Douglas Kinas6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRick Crider vs Sri Sai Kaushik Mushty6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJames Kase / Bryant Alexandre vs Fei Wang / Mark Miller3-6, 3-6
2022-07-09vs MSIL 3.5M A18&O Wang-PeoriaLost 23
W#1 DoublesMartin McCarthy / Joseph Laws vs Erik Siembab / Joe Mulcahey6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesBryan Fasano vs Douglas Kinas1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBob Soltys / James Kase vs Roger Bruere / Mark Miller1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesDouglas Mallett vs Fei Wang6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBryant Alexandre / Rick Crider vs Madhu Reddy / Sri Sai Kaushik Mushty4-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesRick Crider / Martin McCarthy vs Rolando Salazar / Joe McCoy7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSammy Shumake vs Phil Cason6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Catalpa / Bob Soltys vs Steve Scott / Carlos Jimenez6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDouglas Mallett vs John Webb6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBryan Fasano / Joseph Laws vs Bruce Beeman / Alan Martindale6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesRick Crider / Robert Catalpa vs Rolando Salazar / Joe McCoy6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesBryan Fasano vs Caleb Klopfer3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMartin McCarthy / James Kase vs Steve Scott / Carlos Jimenez6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJoseph Laws vs John Webb6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBob Soltys / Sammy Shumake vs Bruce Beeman / Alan Martindale6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · West MSIL A18 & Over 3.5M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MSIL 3.5M A18&O Comte-Bloomington4222823211
2MSIL 3.5M A18&O Soltys-Quincy42181226212
3MSIL 3.5M A18&O Wang-Peoria42171326220
4MSIL 3.5M A18&O Traylor-Springfield0632754331

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Oakley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Douglas Mallett
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
Bryan Fasano
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.01
Joseph Laws
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.96
Martin McCarthy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Bob Soltys
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
James Kase
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Rick Crider
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Robert Catalpa
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sammy Shumake
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bryan Fasano + Joseph Laws4167% gamesnot enough data
Douglas Mallett + Bob Soltys314 matchesnot enough data
Bryan Fasano + Martin McCarthy314 matchesnot enough data
Douglas Mallett + Sammy Shumake303 matchesnot enough data
Bob Soltys + James Kase123 matchesnot enough data
Bob Soltys + Bryan Fasano123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Oakley
4W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Douglas Mallett
17W–11L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Bryan Fasano
16W–14L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
Joseph Laws
17W–17L career · 6 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
Martin McCarthy
13W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96
Bob Soltys
9W–9L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
James Kase
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rick Crider
22W–4L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Catalpa
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sammy Shumake
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.