Teams

Dail/Knoxville

2023 Adult 40 & Over-Knoxville · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-18Won 10
W#1 SinglesEmily Elison vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-15Won 10
W#1 SinglesEmily Elison vs Thuy Duong6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2023-05-12Lost 01
L#1 SinglesEmily Elison vs Amber Davis7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-05-05vs Johnston/KnoxvilleWon 10
W#1 SinglesEmily Elison vs Pearl Jhala6-3, 6-1
2023-04-24Lost 01
L#1 SinglesEmily Elison vs Thuy Duong6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-17vs Johnston/KnoxvilleWon 10
W#1 SinglesEmily Elison vs Pearl Jhala6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Emily Elison
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.21
Kelly Hollingsworth
published
3.19
Shirley Vaughan
published
3.19
Susan Bishofberger
published
3.18
Kelly Carillon
published
3.03
Belinda Gambuzza
published 3.5
3.00
Amy Belew
published 3
2.99
Barbara McCarty
published 3.5
2.98
Gina Grubbs
published
2.97
Kelley Karnes
published
2.90
Karen Dail
published
2.65
Patti West
published
Mary Ellen Smartt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Carillon + Karen Dail1539% gamesnot enough data
Karen Dail + Barbara McCarty033 matchesnot enough data
Gina Grubbs + Kelley Karnes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Elison
136W–77L career · 6 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Kelly Hollingsworth
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Shirley Vaughan
6W–16L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Susan Bishofberger
8W–14L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Kelly Carillon
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Belinda Gambuzza
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Amy Belew
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.00
3.5
Barbara McCarty
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.99
Gina Grubbs
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98
Kelley Karnes
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
Karen Dail
3W–20L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.90
Patti West
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
2.65
Mary Ellen Smartt
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.