Teams

NAZ/Penna/40&Over/3.0W

2022 Adult 40 & Over - NAZ · NAZ 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-11-06vs MedinaLost 12
L#1 DoublesVicki Penna / Laura Moir vs Leslie Medina / Jennifer Bearchell3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoanne Hopmeyer / Barbara Bates vs Lori Pappas / Michelle Pappas2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Nicol / Kristen Downs vs Kim Vallen / Jill Grams6-0, 6-2
2021-11-06vs MedinaWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Nicol / Vicki Penna vs Leslie Medina / Michelle Pappas6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCaroline Austin-Mathur vs Jennifer Bearchell5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLaura Moir / Barbara Bates vs Lori Pappas / Andrea Graves6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-10-09vs McClureWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristen Downs / Vicki Penna vs Diana Kem / Janice Greene2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Moir / Johanna Steigerwald vs Angela Dutton / Janice Brooks6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Tullis / Caroline Austin-Mathur vs Kirsten Gunn / Holly Heurkins6-0, 6-1
2021-10-09vs McClureWon 40
W#1 DoublesLaura Nicol / Kristen Downs vs Janice Greene / Angela Dutton6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesCaroline Austin-Mathur vs Janice Brooks7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Moir / Johanna Steigerwald vs Diana Kem / Kirsten Gunn6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Tullis / KAREN MORGAN vs JB Birdt / Holly Heurkins7-5, 6-2
2021-09-18vs MedinaLost 13
L#1 DoublesLaura Nicol / Barbara Bates vs Leslie Medina / Kim Vallen4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLisa Tullis vs Jill Grams7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Moir / Vicki Penna vs Jennifer Bearchell / Michelle Pappas7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJohanna Steigerwald / Joanne Hopmeyer vs Lori Pappas / Abigail Isakson3-6, 4-6
2021-09-18vs MedinaWon 31
W#1 DoublesLaura Moir / Laura Nicol vs Leslie Medina / Kim Vallen6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesBarbara Bates vs Jennifer Bearchell2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesVicki Penna / Lisa Tullis vs Lori Pappas / Michelle Pappas6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJoanne Hopmeyer / Johanna Steigerwald vs Jill Grams / Abigail Isakson6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2021-09-11vs McClureLost 12
W#1 DoublesKristen Downs / Laura Nicol vs Janice Greene / Diana Kem5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoanne Hopmeyer / Vicki Penna vs Diane McClure / Kirsten Gunn3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrenda Garrod / Lisa Tullis vs Susan Spear / Holly Heurkins2-6, 2-6
2021-09-11vs McClureSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKristen Downs / Laura Nicol vs Janice Greene / Diane McClure7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLisa Tullis vs Susan Spear6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Moir / Vicki Penna vs Janice Brooks / Diana Kem6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBrenda Garrod / Joanne Hopmeyer vs Kirsten Gunn / JB Birdt1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · NAZ 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NAZ/Penna/40&Over/3.0W53191332297
2Medina44151735284
3McClure35131942310

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Caroline Austin-Mathur
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Laura Nicol
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
3.25
Kristen Downs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Lisa Tullis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.83
Laura Moir
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.81
Joanne Hopmeyer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.76
Vicki Penna
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.73
Johanna Steigerwald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.51
Barbara Bates
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Downs + Laura Nicol131055% games+5.3% vs expected
Caroline Austin-Mathur + Laura Nicol3260% games+1.4% vs expected
Joanne Hopmeyer + Johanna Steigerwald3544% games+0.8% vs expected
Vicki Penna + Laura Moir2342% games−5.2% vs expected
Vicki Penna + Lisa Tullis6548% games−5.7% vs expected
Barbara Bates + Lisa Tullis3252% gamesnot enough data
Joanne Hopmeyer + Lisa Tullis404 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Downs + Vicki Penna213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Austin-Mathur
51W–36L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Laura Nicol
69W–51L career · 13 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Kristen Downs
56W–55L career · 8 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Lisa Tullis
47W–31L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
Laura Moir
23W–23L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83
Joanne Hopmeyer
27W–57L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
2.81
Vicki Penna
40W–50L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Johanna Steigerwald
29W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Barbara Bates
18W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.