← Teams

MPRC-Atkins

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.79 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Adrienne VanBeckhoven
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Susan Suttich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.49
Joelle Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.49
Nancy Atkins
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.32
Kathleen Budnick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Lisa Cohns
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.07
Michelle Dombek
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2022-11-20Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesLisa Cohns / Joanne Criscione vs Kristen Fisher / Teresa Jackson6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNancy Atkins / Kathleen Budnick vs Nancy Garlock / Gwen Matthews2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAdrienne VanBeckhoven / Michelle Dombek vs Hong Allen / Linda Graham6-3, 6-4
2022-11-13Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLisa Cohns / Kathleen Budnick vs Char Riley / Linda Paulk6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichelle Dombek / Adrienne VanBeckhoven vs Cathy Porter / Mary Elliott6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDebbie Tingey / Susan Suttich vs Kate Hunter / Lisa Lyon6-3, 6-2
2022-10-22Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJoelle Lewis / Lydia Smith vs Carrie Fisher / Lynn Sosa7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDebbie Tingey / Kathleen Budnick vs Janet de Morgan / Mary Sides6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCindy Harris / Susan Suttich vs Sharon Grilley / Tamara Witcosky6-3, 6-4
2022-10-21Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesLisa Cohns / Joelle Lewis vs Ellen Bowman / Cheryl Roloff6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Suttich / Debbie Tingey vs Julie Hanson / Kathleen Murrin7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNancy Atkins / Kathleen Budnick vs Hideko Kershaw / Margaret Sivertsen6-3, 7-5
2022-10-15Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesLisa Cohns / Joelle Lewis vs Diana Almy / Tina Clancy6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSusan Suttich / Debbie Tingey vs Pamela Buckley / Laura Webb7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Nancy Atkins vs Kelly Asbridge / Cindy Rushall6-3, 6-3
2022-10-02Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesLisa Cohns / Joanne Criscione vs Erica Tsuruta / Lynn Sosa7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJoelle Lewis / Lydia Smith vs Tamara Witcosky / Carrie Fisher6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAdrienne VanBeckhoven / Michelle Dombek vs Mary Rousseau / Anne Fahlbusch7-5, 6-2
2022-09-25Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJoelle Lewis / Lydia Smith vs Cathy Valentine / Shelly Perkins7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLisa Cohns / Joanne Criscione vs Tracy Ouyang / Gwen Matthews6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNancy Atkins / Kathleen Budnick vs Hong Allen / Linda Graham7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Adrienne VanBeckhoven
39W–22L career
3%97%0%
3.70
4
Susan Suttich
59W–35L career
9%91%0%
3.65
4
Joelle Lewis
37W–46L career
39%61%0%
3.49
4
Nancy Atkins
79W–82L career
38%62%0%
3.49
3.5
Kathleen Budnick
138W–170L career
0%98%2%
3.32
3.5
Lisa Cohns
17W–25L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Michelle Dombek
38W–54L career
15%85%0%
3.07

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.