Teams

Chamizo (Dante Fascell)

2025 MIAMIDADE Adult 40 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 3.0 Adult Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Rhonda MacAu
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
3.35
Teresa Roades
published
3.09
Natalia Emiliani C
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Emilia Osorio
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.91
Mary Cordero
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.89
Maria Basterra
usually #1 Singles 69%, also #3 Doubles 15% · published 3
2.84
Carolina Milano
published 3
2.82
2.80
Sheila Ringel
published
2.75
Sherien Elbahkeiry
published
2.75
Rosemary McComas
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Christian Chamizo
usually #4 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.72
Beth Lang
published 3
2.71
Rosana Weinstein Aronson
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Rina Saborio
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rosemary McComas + Christian Chamizo41445% games−11.3% vs expected
Rhonda MacAu + Maria Basterra8267% gamesnot enough data
Christian Chamizo + Rina Saborio4255% gamesnot enough data
Christian Chamizo + Maria Basterra3357% gamesnot enough data
Rina Saborio + Rosana Weinstein Aronson3356% gamesnot enough data
Rhonda MacAu + Natalia Emiliani C314 matchesnot enough data
Sherien Elbahkeiry + Maria Basterra224 matchesnot enough data
Rosana Weinstein Aronson + Maria Basterra404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rhonda MacAu
113W–54L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Teresa Roades
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3
Natalia Emiliani C
99W–102L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.09
3
Emilia Osorio
43W–38L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Mary Cordero
90W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.91
3
Maria Basterra
112W–142L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.89
3
Carolina Milano
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Amy van Den Dijssel
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
Sheila Ringel
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Sherien Elbahkeiry
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Rosemary McComas
44W–51L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Christian Chamizo
77W–87L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Beth Lang
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Rosana Weinstein Aronson
81W–56L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Rina Saborio
58W–76L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.