Teams

SFV-LLW-Balboa/Ik Jun/Joe Chan

2025 SoCal Doubles 18 SFV Fall WE · SFV 18 WEEKEND - Men 4.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-26vs SFV-Porter Valley CC/Susan GossWon 20
W#1 DoublesSebastien Damas / Daniel Gold vs Steve Felsen / Neil Patak6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesIk Jun / Gene Park vs Shane Duffy / Kent Goss7-6, 6-3
2025-10-05vs SFV-Porter Valley CC/Susan GossLost 12
W#1 DoublesConrad Chilcott / Daniel Gold vs Neil Patak / Evan Press6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAshish Bangar / Solomon Daud vs Shane Duffy / Jay Jackson1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBrandon Su / Derrick Perry vs Raman Sain / Steve Felsen2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 WEEKEND - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Daniel Gold
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.33
Todd Nagler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Alex Nassif
published 4.5
Conrad Chilcott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Derrick Perry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Ik Jun
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.23
Sebastien Damas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.18
Leonardo Kim
published
4.09
Brandon Su
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Alan Siu
published 4.5
4.03
Ashish Bangar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Joe Chan
published
3.87
Saeed Saed
published
3.71
Gene Park
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Solomon Daud
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joe Chan + Saeed Saed4259% games+17.5% vs expected
Saeed Saed + Todd Nagler5455% games−2.9% vs expected
Joe Chan + Brandon Su213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Gold
9W–2L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Todd Nagler
71W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Alex Nassif
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Conrad Chilcott
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Derrick Perry
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ik Jun
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
Sebastien Damas
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Leonardo Kim
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Brandon Su
11W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Alan Siu
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Ashish Bangar
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
4.03
Joe Chan
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
4.00
Saeed Saed
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.87
Gene Park
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.71
Solomon Daud
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.