Teams

Connelly 4.5

2021 Frederick County Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Women 4.5

8 players · average NTRP 4.40 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-09vs RoyWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Besse / Jean Lim vs Lisa Scott / Shelena Sanderson7-6, 5-2
2021-05-25vs RoyWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathleen Su / Maria Woolpert vs Lisa Scott / Shelena Sanderson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Jagodits / Jean Lim vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-22vs RoyLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnne Jagodits / Wendy Heger vs Sharon Walsh / Jennifer Murduck6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2021-05-16vs RoySplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnne Jagodits / Angie Martin vs Lisa Roy / Jennifer Murduck6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesWendy Heger / Carol Besse vs Sharon Tennyson / Sharon Walsh6-1, 6-0
2021-05-13vs RoySplit 11
L#1 SinglesKathleen Su vs Aline Rodriguez7-5, 2-4
W#2 DoublesJean Lim / Carol Besse vs Stephanie Almeida / Sharon Walsh6-2, 6-1
2021-05-10vs RoySplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnne Jagodits / Angie Martin vs Lisa Scott / Shelena Sanderson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesQuynh Tran / Carol Besse vs Jennifer Murduck / Sharon Tennyson5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-05-05vs RoyLost 01
L#2 DoublesVicky Parra / Wendy Heger vs Sharon Walsh / Sharon Tennyson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Anne Jagodits
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.20
Kathleen Su
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.06
Carol Besse
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.04
Jean Lim
published
4.02
Wendy Heger
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4.5
3.82
Joy Oliver
published
3.79
Jaime Lewis
published 4
3.63
Maria Woolpert
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Heger + Carol Besse171752% games−0.4% vs expected
Anne Jagodits + Carol Besse123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anne Jagodits
208W–213L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Kathleen Su
96W–77L career · 2 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Carol Besse
288W–186L career · 4 lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
4.06
Jean Lim
18W–38L career · no lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
4.04
4.5
Wendy Heger
142W–188L career · 7 lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
4.02
Joy Oliver
15W–10L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Jaime Lewis
7W–10L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.79
Maria Woolpert
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.