Teams

LA - MountainGate

2022 Weekday Spring Women's Doubles - Local League Only · LA - Women 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.79 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-16vs LA - Century CityLost 02
L#2 DoublesYolanda Zackler / Natalie Mahdesian vs Debra Holstein / Haleh Emrani1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Farhadi / Betty Shalom vs Stacie Smiley / Kelly Nielson1-6, 0-6
2022-05-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Farhadi / Betty Shalom vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-20vs LA - LATC Drop ShotsWon 10
W#2 DoublesYolanda Zackler / Vicki Weinstein vs Beverly Gatica / Shauna Cross6-3, 6-1
2022-05-12vs LA - WonderwomenWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Farhadi / Betty Shalom vs Indira Laksmana / Celine Maullin6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-05vs LA - Full Metal RacquetsWon 10
W#2 DoublesYolanda Zackler / Parisa Morris vs Jennifer Demoff / Joanna Ku6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Rebecca Mall
published 4.5
4.07
Jennifer Toplitzky
published 4.5
3.80
Parisa Morris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Rachel Czer
published
3.60
Michelle Farhadi
published
3.58
Betty Shalom
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Yolanda Zackler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Dilek Durrani
published 3.5
3.15
Vicki Weinstein
published
3.05
Tracy Levine
published
2.89
Simone Friedman
published
2.61
Anette Levine
published 3
Janet Bray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Mall + Jennifer Toplitzky741664% games+0.7% vs expected
Simone Friedman + Tracy Levine044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Rebecca Mall
143W–45L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Jennifer Toplitzky
129W–29L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Parisa Morris
75W–40L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Rachel Czer
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
Michelle Farhadi
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Betty Shalom
121W–55L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%26%74%
3.58
3.5
Yolanda Zackler
65W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Dilek Durrani
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Vicki Weinstein
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.15
Tracy Levine
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
Simone Friedman
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
2.89
3
Anette Levine
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
2.61
Janet Bray
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.