Teams

5 ACAC Strobl's Single Ladies

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-15vs 8 Belmont - NelsonSplit 11
W#2 SinglesGabriela Vazquez vs Jana Chesley6-4, 6-0
L#3 SinglesMichelle Eavey vs Mai Khanh Nguyen3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-10-21vs 9 Westwood DeanLost 03
L#1 SinglesAriana Dickens vs Lauren Connor5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMyrna Abed vs Kate Redding5-7, 3-6
L#3 SinglesMichelle Eavey vs Katrin Wilcox1-6, 1-6
2025-10-14vs 7 ACAC CurtisLost 12
W#1 SinglesCecilia Bergh vs Mary Wagoner4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJessica Cox vs Ashley Curtis4-6, 4-3
L#3 SinglesMichelle Eavey vs Tatiana Bueno1-6, 1-6
2025-10-09vs 10 Magnolia Green WintersWon 21
L#1 SinglesCecilia Bergh vs Molly Palenski3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMyrna Abed vs Samantha Petrich7-6, 6-4
W#3 SinglesJessica Cox vs Jennifer Conrad6-2, 6-3
2025-10-08vs 17 CCV PeanutsLost 03
L#1 SinglesGabriela Vazquez vs Elizabeth Crowley3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAriana Dickens vs Sarah Graper2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesEun Lee vs Tina Winn0-6, 5-7
2025-10-07vs 1 HCC MayerLost 12
L#1 SinglesLori Strobl vs Charlotte Caporale6-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesGabriela Vazquez vs Sidney Mayer2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesMyrna Abed vs Meghan Hale6-4, 6-2
2025-09-30vs 3 MTC Singles Ladies - HannonWon 21
L#1 SinglesAriana Dickens vs Tina Hayer6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJessica Cox vs Micol Hutchison6-3, 7-5
W#3 SinglesMyrna Abed vs Angela Futrell6-3, 6-2
2025-09-23vs 20 Burkwood Lu GoldenLost 12
W#1 SinglesLori Strobl vs Brooke van Zandt6-3, 7-5
L#2 SinglesAriana Dickens vs Jessica Golden7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesEun Lee vs Mary Beth El-Shafie1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Lori Strobl
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.94
Cecilia Bergh
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.88
Jessica Cox
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.80
Ariana Dickens
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.34
Michelle Eavey
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.14
Eun Lee
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Gabriela Vazquez
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Myrna Abed
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Strobl
27W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Cecilia Bergh
15W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
Jessica Cox
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Ariana Dickens
14W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Michelle Eavey
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.34
Eun Lee
9W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Gabriela Vazquez
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Myrna Abed
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.