← Teams

PTC-Reis

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.83 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Ken Nichols
usually #2 Doubles 82%, also #3 Doubles 9% · published 4
3.69
Butch Dela Cruz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
3.65
Scott Reis
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.54
Jason Moore-Greenke
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.43
Joe Entler
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
—
Kevin Shoop
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Results9 ties
2019-04-06Lost 0–3
L#2 DoublesKen Nichols / Jack Hughes vs Matt Simmering / Levi Huddleston6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKevin Shoop vs Steve Vanderploeg6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesScott Reis / Peter Katon vs Greg Finnegan / Sushil Srivastava6-4, 6-1
2019-03-30Lost 1–2
L#1 SinglesJoe Entler vs Ben Merritt6-4, 2-3
W#2 DoublesScott Reis / Joe Warner vs Terence Gariety / Bruce Robertson4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKevin Shoop vs Keith Gordon7-5, 7-6
2019-03-16Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesButch Dela Cruz / Ken Nichols vs Joonie Kaneshige / Richard Santos2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJason Moore-Greenke vs Kevin Muck6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesScott Reis / Joe Warner vs John Hapke / Jeremy Goodson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2019-03-02Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesButch Dela Cruz / Jack Hughes vs Ahmad Garakani / Christopher Gilmore7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKen Nichols / Joe Entler vs Kevin Heller / Patrick Maginnis6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesScott Reis / Jason Moore-Greenke vs Sam Aiello / Jonathan Caplan6-2, 6-1
2019-02-24Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesButch Dela Cruz / Jack Hughes vs James Feeney / Tyler Shoemaker6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoe Entler / Ken Nichols vs Peter Aleman / Shung Shin3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPeter Katon / Scott Reis vs Joey Gaylor / Sean Wilcox6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2019-02-09Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesButch Dela Cruz / Jack Hughes vs Joonie Kaneshige / Richard Santos7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoe Entler / Ken Nichols vs Larry Benedict / Rob Benedict4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCaesar Bernardo / Jason Moore-Greenke vs Charles Hahn / John Hapke6-4, 6-4
2019-02-02Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesButch Dela Cruz / Jack Hughes vs Ahmad Garakani / Nate Look7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJoe Entler / Ken Nichols vs Dave Cobban / Jim Nudelman7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCaesar Bernardo / Jason Moore-Greenke vs Jonathan Caplan / Christopher Gilmore3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2019-01-12Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesJoe Entler / Ken Nichols vs James Raleigh / John Workman6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesScott Reis / Peter Katon vs Sam Ko / Jeff Wheeler6-0, 6-3
2018-12-09Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Schwarz / Scott Reis vs Julie Carmena / Alex Harbell6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Ken Nichols
123W–93L career
0%99%1%
3.82
4.5
Butch Dela Cruz
36W–95L career
89%11%0%
3.69
3.5
Scott Reis
56W–58L career
0%39%61%
3.65
4
Jason Moore-Greenke
71W–74L career
22%78%0%
3.54
3.5
Joe Entler
28W–42L career
0%89%11%
3.43
3.5
Kevin Shoop
45W–35L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.