Teams

Plant City Misfits - E. Gray

2023 Hillsborough Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 4.20 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#2 DoublesJacob Liebler / Emiliya Cogdill vs Donald Bell / Kristi Krohmer7-5, 6-1
2023-06-11vs Cheval - A. McNamaraSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJacob Liebler / Ronghui You vs Davis Bilardello / Christina Brugger3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesEA Gray / Kristie Bryan vs Felipe Martinez / Natalie Martinez6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJoshua McClelland / Kristie Bryan vs Michael Rossi / Laura DeHaan2-6, 1-1
2023-05-21vs Florida/Helme/18&Over8.0XDLost 01
L#1 DoublesJacob Liebler / Alys Klouse vs Mike Moenter / Matura Suksai3-6, 1-6
2023-05-09vs River Hills - T. ManganelloLost 01
L#1 DoublesEnrique Escobar / Ronghui You vs Manuel Alvarez / Amanda Deck2-6, 3-6
2023-05-07vs Plant City Misfits TOO - S. PatrickSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNICHOLAS INNISS / Ronghui You vs Jason Leppert / Makensie Campanella6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJoshua McClelland / Kristie Bryan vs PRAFUL NAIR / Leticia Leppert7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-16vs HCC - E. VargasWon 10
W#3 DoublesEA Gray / Emiliya Cogdill vs Ray Eckstein / Nelci Rodrigues6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Kristie Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.15
Geoffrey Jones
published
4.11
Andrea Fajardo
published 4.5
4.04
Shannon Griffin
published
4.00
NICHOLAS INNISS
published
3.97
Alison Verlinich
published 4
3.92
Jacob Liebler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Ronghui You
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Alys Klouse
published 4
3.43
EA Gray
published
3.29
Emiliya Cogdill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kristie Bryan
58W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.21
Geoffrey Jones
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Andrea Fajardo
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
4.11
Shannon Griffin
27W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
4.04
NICHOLAS INNISS
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Alison Verlinich
12W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.97
Jacob Liebler
36W–39L career · 6 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
3.92
4
Ronghui You
81W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Alys Klouse
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
EA Gray
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.43
Emiliya Cogdill
97W–79L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.