Teams

Lott Park-Blomeyer/Parvin

2025 Combo 40 & Over Women Day - Mobile · 6.5 Women Day 40

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-22vs MTC - Lamar/PughLost 03
L#1 DoublesJill Emmertson / Merilyn Roach vs Ashley DeAndrade / Mary Ann Harrison3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaine Flannigan / Danielle Parvin vs Susan Eways / Karen Nenstiel3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMary Hadley / Dana Pollet vs Kim Pugh / Paige Graf1-6, 1-6
2025-07-08vs Lott Park- RushLost 12
L#1 DoublesRuth Rye / Merilyn Roach vs Stephanie Boll / Ashley Mayfield1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBridgette Dinelli / Jill Emmertson vs Tammy Rush / Regan Lawson6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMary Hadley / Jennifer Leirer vs Larkin Peters / Robin Wright3-6, 3-6
2025-06-24vs Lott Park - Hassen/BritainLost 12
W#1 DoublesJill Emmertson / Merilyn Roach vs Peri Summersell / Pamela Britain6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDana Pollet / Ruth Rye vs Jill Hassen / Vicki Fowler0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBridgette Dinelli / Jennifer Leirer vs Kimberly Long / Anna Snyder2-6, 2-6
2025-06-10vs Fairhope - Sandefur/MatzengerLost 12
L#1 DoublesRuth Rye / Merilyn Roach vs Pam Stein / Janet Hurley6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJill Boyles / Jill Emmertson vs Rhonda Wall / Stephanie Sullivan2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJanet Skinner / Jennifer Leirer vs Renea Canton / Catherine Madden6-1, 6-2
2025-06-03vs MO 6.5W 40 & Over (Crowley/Bailey)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJill Emmertson / Merilyn Roach vs Blair Carmichael-Lober / Dana McKean0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJill Boyles / Dana Pollet vs Ashley Hagan / Holly Jordan3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRuth Rye / Janet Skinner vs Martina Forsch / Gail Mathews1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women Day 40 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Ruth Rye
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Merilyn Roach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Jill Emmertson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.91
Laine Flannigan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Bridgette Dinelli
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Elaine Weil
published
2.66
Barbara Blomeyer
published 3
2.64
Dana Pollet
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Janet Skinner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Jill Boyles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Debra Shotlander
published 3
2.58
Danielle Parvin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Jennifer Leirer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Mary Hadley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Merilyn Roach + Jill Emmertson10952% games+6.7% vs expected
Elaine Weil + Barbara Blomeyer8750% games−1.5% vs expected
Danielle Parvin + Dana Pollet1535% games−2.9% vs expected
Janet Skinner + Dana Pollet2446% games−5.5% vs expected
Merilyn Roach + Ruth Rye4940% games−6.2% vs expected
Debra Shotlander + Elaine Weil134 matchesnot enough data
Janet Skinner + Ruth Rye033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ruth Rye
11W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.95
Merilyn Roach
36W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Jill Emmertson
25W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Laine Flannigan
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Bridgette Dinelli
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Elaine Weil
14W–24L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Barbara Blomeyer
17W–25L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Dana Pollet
5W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Janet Skinner
6W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Jill Boyles
15W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Debra Shotlander
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Danielle Parvin
5W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
28%71%<1%
2.58
Jennifer Leirer
10W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%39%61%
2.54
Mary Hadley
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.