Teams

KC-RH BLUE

2024 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - DAYTIME

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-19vs LEBTC NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristen Hoffman / Katie Policaro vs Natalie Lucero / Stephanie Lanziner4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRobin Vint / Erin Todd vs Jennifer McPherson / Sally Gibson3-6, 1-6
2024-06-12vs CCC BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesAshley Campsie / Katie Policaro vs Erin Wiley / Leesa Blanding7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2024-06-05vs KC-RH REDLost 01
L#3 DoublesKathryn Tobey / Robin Vint vs Maria Fischer / Jennifer Manta0-6, 0-6
2024-05-29vs SS-H REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesAshley Campsie / Erin Todd vs Alison Wheeler / Megan Whelan2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKathryn Tobey / Robin Vint vs Whitney Baylor / Jessica Field2-6, 1-6
2024-05-22vs LTFC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshley Campsie / Katie Policaro vs Debbie Lepetsos / Diane Liberty6-4, 6-4
2024-05-15vs LEBTC NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatie Policaro / Robin Vint vs Stephanie Lanziner / Natalie Lucero2-6, 1-6
2024-05-08vs CCC BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristen Hoffman / Ashley Campsie vs Olivia Booysen / Katie Cohen7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Ashley Campsie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Kristen Hoffman
published
2.80
Katie Policaro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Carolyn Wachuta
published 3
2.51
Laurie Ross
published
2.43
Robin Vint
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.36
Kathryn Tobey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Hoffman + Ashley Campsie13660% games+1.5% vs expected
Kristen Hoffman + Carolyn Wachuta1446% gamesnot enough data
Robin Vint + Katie Policaro044 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Ross + Kathryn Tobey123 matchesnot enough data
Robin Vint + Ashley Campsie123 matchesnot enough data
Katie Policaro + Ashley Campsie123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ashley Campsie
86W–61L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
2.96
Kristen Hoffman
19W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Katie Policaro
50W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Carolyn Wachuta
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Laurie Ross
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Robin Vint
37W–93L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.43
Kathryn Tobey
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.